Write a brief message on Kathleen Gough’s research on marriage among Kerala’s Nayars.
Write a note on Kathleen Gough study of marriage among the Nayars of Kerala.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Introduction
Kathleen Gough's study of marriage among the Nayars of Kerala is a landmark anthropological work that provides valuable insights into the complex social structure and marital practices of this matrilineal community in Southern India. Gough's research, conducted in the mid-20th century, challenged prevailing notions about marriage and kinship, offering a nuanced understanding of the Nayars' unique social organization.
1. Background and Context
To appreciate Gough's study, it is essential to understand the historical and cultural context of the Nayars. The Nayars are a prominent community in the state of Kerala, known for their matrilineal and matrilocal social structure. The traditional Western understanding of marriage and family did not easily apply to the Nayars, making them a fascinating subject for anthropological inquiry.
2. Matrilineality and Matrilocality Among the Nayars
Gough delved into the intricacies of Nayar social organization, highlighting the significance of matrilineality and matrilocality. In Nayar society, lineage and property are traced through the maternal line, with daughters inheriting family assets. Furthermore, newlywed couples often reside with the wife's family, contributing to the matrilocal aspect of their marital arrangement. This departure from the more common patrilineal and patrilocal systems challenged prevailing anthropological theories at the time.
3. The Sambandham System
Gough's study extensively explored the Sambandham system, a distinctive feature of Nayar marriage. Unlike the Western notion of monogamous, lifelong unions, the Nayars practiced a system where a woman could have multiple Sambandhams, temporary unions with men. These unions did not carry the legal and social implications of marriage but involved certain rituals and obligations. Gough's work brought attention to the complexity and flexibility of Nayar marriage practices.
4. Rituals and Symbolism in Nayar Marriages
Gough meticulously documented the rituals and symbolic elements associated with Nayar marriages. From the elaborate pre-pubertal thalikettu kalyanam ceremony to the more informal Sambandham arrangements, each ritual had specific meanings and implications within the Nayar social structure. The detailed analysis of these ceremonies provided a deeper understanding of how marriage was conceptualized and practiced in Nayar society.
5. Role of Women in Nayar Society
Gough's study shed light on the unique status and roles of Nayar women within their society. Matrilineality afforded women a significant role in property inheritance and lineage continuity. The Sambandham system also provided women with agency and autonomy in choosing their partners. This contrasted sharply with Western perceptions of women's roles in traditional societies, challenging prevailing stereotypes.
6. Contributions to Anthropological Theory
Kathleen Gough's study of Nayar marriage made substantial contributions to anthropological theory. Her work questioned the universality of Western marriage norms, challenging the ethnocentric biases prevalent in the discipline. Gough's findings underscored the importance of cultural relativism, urging anthropologists to approach diverse societies with an open mind and to refrain from imposing Eurocentric frameworks on non-Western practices.
7. Critiques and Legacy of Gough's Study
While Gough's work has been influential, it has not been without critiques. Some scholars have argued that her study may have oversimplified certain aspects of Nayar marriage or overemphasized the exotic nature of their practices. Additionally, debates persist about the degree to which matrilineality and matrilocality are genuinely egalitarian, as Gough suggested. Nevertheless, Gough's study remains a foundational work that paved the way for further research on non-Western marital practices and social structures.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Kathleen Gough's study of marriage among the Nayars of Kerala stands as a seminal work in the field of anthropology. Her meticulous examination of Nayar social organization, matrilineality, and the Sambandham system challenged Eurocentric perspectives and contributed to a more nuanced understanding of marriage in diverse cultural contexts. Gough's legacy endures as a reminder of the importance of cultural sensitivity and the continual reevaluation of anthropological theories in the pursuit of a more comprehensive understanding of human societies.