Write a short note on Hetvabhasa.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Hetvabhasa: The Fallacy of Irrelevant Reasoning
Hetvabhasa, in Nyaya and Indian logic, refers to the fallacy of irrelevant reasoning or the flaw in the middle term of a syllogism. It occurs when the reason provided in support of the conclusion is either irrelevant or does not establish a valid connection between the subject and predicate terms.
The term "Hetu" represents the middle term in a syllogism, and "Abhasa" means semblance or appearance. Hetvabhasa occurs when the apparent reasoning seems valid but is, in reality, irrelevant or inadequate. This fallacy undermines the logical structure of an argument by introducing a middle term that fails to establish a genuine connection between the premises and the conclusion.
Recognizing Hetvabhasa is crucial for maintaining the integrity of logical reasoning. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the middle term used in an argument genuinely supports the conclusion and is not misleading or irrelevant. Addressing this fallacy contributes to the construction of sound and cogent arguments within the framework of Indian logic.