Home/ Questions/Q 31112
Next
In Process
Ramakant Sharma
Ink Innovator
Asked: 2024-03-17T13:44:56+05:30 In:

What is the difference between self-assessment and peer assessment? Develop a rubric for self-assessment of written tasks in the subject you teach at the secondary level.

What distinguishes peer evaluation from self-evaluation? Create a rubric that students may use to evaluate their own written assignments in the secondary topic you teach.

BES-124IGNOU
Share

    1 Answer

    1. Power Elite Author

      Difference between Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment

      1. Self-Assessment:

        • Definition: Self-assessment is a process where individuals evaluate their own work, skills, or performance against set criteria or standards.
        • Key Characteristics:
          • Self-directed: Individuals assess their own work independently.
          • Reflective: Involves reflecting on one's own strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
          • Internal Perspective: Assessment is based on personal judgment and understanding of the criteria.
        • Example: A student reviewing their own essay to check for grammar, structure, and adherence to the assignment requirements.

      2. Peer Assessment:

        • Definition: Peer assessment involves students assessing the work of their peers against predetermined criteria or standards.
        • Key Characteristics:
          • Collaborative: Involves students providing feedback to each other.
          • External Perspective: Assessment is based on the perspective of others, providing different insights.
          • Reciprocal: Students both give and receive feedback from their peers.
        • Example: Students in a group project evaluating each other's contributions and providing constructive feedback.

      Rubric for Self-Assessment of Written Tasks in the Subject of English at the Secondary Level

      Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Needs Improvement (1)
      Content – Demonstrates thorough understanding of the topic.
      – Presents ideas clearly and cohesively.
      – Provides insightful analysis and interpretation.      		 – Demonstrates good understanding of the topic.
      – Presents ideas clearly.
      – Provides some analysis and interpretation.      		 – Demonstrates basic understanding of the topic.
      – Presents ideas somewhat clearly.
      – Provides limited analysis and interpretation.      		 – Demonstrates limited understanding of the topic.
      – Presents ideas unclearly.
      – Provides little to no analysis or interpretation.
      Organization – Structure of the writing enhances understanding.
      – Logical flow of ideas.
      – Transitions are smooth and effective.      		 – Structure of the writing is clear.
      – Ideas are organized logically.
      – Transitions are mostly smooth.      		 – Structure of the writing is somewhat clear.
      – Ideas are somewhat organized.
      – Transitions are somewhat smooth.      		 – Structure of the writing is unclear.
      – Ideas are poorly organized.
      – Transitions are lacking.
      Language Use – Language is sophisticated and appropriate for the audience.
      – Varied and precise vocabulary.
      – Sentence structures are varied and effective.      		 – Language is appropriate for the audience.
      – Vocabulary is varied and mostly precise.
      – Some variation in sentence structures.      		 – Language is somewhat appropriate for the audience.
      – Limited vocabulary.
      – Simple sentence structures.      		 – Language is inappropriate for the audience.
      – Limited vocabulary and poor word choice.
      – Simple and repetitive sentence structures.
      Mechanics and Style – Demonstrates mastery of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      – Consistent and appropriate style.
      – Error-free writing.      		 – Demonstrates good command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      – Mostly consistent style.
      – Few minor errors.      		 – Demonstrates basic command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      – Style is somewhat inconsistent.
      – Some errors.      		 – Demonstrates limited command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      – Inconsistent style.
      – Numerous errors.

      Conclusion:

      • Self-assessment and peer assessment are both valuable tools for students to evaluate their work and improve their learning outcomes. While self-assessment provides students with the opportunity to reflect on their own work, peer assessment offers insights from others and promotes collaboration. Both methods can be used in conjunction to enhance the learning experience and promote a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
      • 0

    Related Questions