Write a short note on Kevalapramana and Anupramana.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In Indian philosophy, especially in the Nyaya and Mimamsa schools, epistemology revolves around the valid means of knowledge (pramanas). Two key pramanas are Kevalapramana and Anupramana.
Kevalapramana refers to direct or independent means of knowledge, where knowledge is acquired without the need for any other source of information or inference. It denotes immediate and non-mediated cognition. Perception (pratyaksha) is often considered the prime example of Kevalapramana, as it involves direct sensory experience without any intermediary.
Anupramana, on the other hand, refers to inferential knowledge, where one derives conclusions based on reasoning or inference from other valid means of knowledge. Anupramana includes inference (anumana), comparison (upamana), and verbal testimony (shabda). Unlike Kevalapramana, Anupramana involves a process of logical deduction or reasoning, relying on other sources of knowledge to arrive at conclusions.
Both Kevalapramana and Anupramana play significant roles in understanding the nature of knowledge acquisition and epistemological inquiry within Indian philosophical traditions. They provide frameworks for understanding how knowledge is obtained and validated through direct perception and inference, respectively.