Analyze how comparative public administration is affected by new public management, new public service, and comparative public policy.
Prismatic Society: Understanding Riggs' Concept In his seminal work, "The Ecology of Public Administration," Fred W. Riggs introduced the concept of the prismatic society to describe the complexities of societal development and administrative structures in developing countries. RiggsRead more
Prismatic Society: Understanding Riggs' Concept
In his seminal work, "The Ecology of Public Administration," Fred W. Riggs introduced the concept of the prismatic society to describe the complexities of societal development and administrative structures in developing countries. Riggs proposed this framework as an alternative to traditional dichotomies such as modern vs. traditional or developed vs. underdeveloped. Here's an in-depth exploration of the features of the prismatic society:
1. Diversity and Pluralism
A prismatic society is characterized by diverse cultural, social, economic, and political dynamics. Riggs emphasized the coexistence of multiple social systems, each with its own norms, values, and institutions. This diversity contributes to the complexity of societal interactions and administrative challenges, as different groups may have conflicting interests and priorities.
2. Dual and Overlapping Structures
Riggs observed that prismatic societies often exhibit dual and overlapping administrative structures, reflecting the influence of both traditional and modern elements. While formal bureaucratic institutions may exist alongside informal networks and customary practices, their boundaries are often blurred, leading to complex patterns of governance and decision-making.
3. Segmental Differentiation
Prismatic societies exhibit segmental differentiation, where social, economic, and political structures are organized into distinct segments or spheres of influence. These segments may be based on factors such as ethnicity, religion, class, or regional identity. Segmental differentiation shapes patterns of resource allocation, power distribution, and social mobilization within the society.
4. Role of the State
In prismatic societies, the role of the state is often ambiguous and contested. While the state may possess formal authority and legal legitimacy, its capacity to govern effectively is often constrained by factors such as corruption, patronage, and bureaucratic inefficiency. As a result, alternative sources of authority and governance, such as traditional leaders or non-state actors, may play significant roles in shaping public policy and service delivery.
5. Hybridity and Adaptation
Prismatic societies exhibit hybridity and adaptation, as they navigate between traditional and modern influences while responding to dynamic socio-economic and political forces. Administrative structures and practices in prismatic societies are often characterized by innovation, improvisation, and resilience, as they seek to reconcile competing demands and address emerging challenges.
6. Dependency and External Influences
Riggs highlighted the role of external influences, such as colonial legacies, international aid, and globalization, in shaping the trajectories of prismatic societies. Dependency on external actors and resources can both empower and constrain prismatic societies, influencing their development trajectories, administrative practices, and socio-economic dynamics.
7. Administrative Praxis
Administrative praxis refers to the practical application of administrative principles and practices in prismatic societies. Riggs argued that conventional administrative models, derived from Western contexts, may not be fully applicable or effective in prismatic societies due to their unique socio-cultural, economic, and political contexts. As such, administrative praxis in prismatic societies often involves adaptation, improvisation, and experimentation to address local needs and challenges.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the concept of the prismatic society, as propounded by Fred W. Riggs, provides a valuable framework for understanding the complexities of societal development and administrative structures in developing countries. By emphasizing the diversity, dualism, segmental differentiation, and hybridity of prismatic societies, Riggs challenges conventional dichotomies and offers insights into the unique challenges and opportunities facing these societies. Understanding the features of the prismatic society is essential for policymakers, administrators, and scholars seeking to address the complex realities of governance and development in diverse socio-cultural contexts.
See less
Impact of New Public Management on Comparative Public Administration New Public Management (NPM) emerged in the late 20th century as a reform movement aimed at enhancing the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of public sector organizations. Here's how NPM has impacted comparative pubRead more
Impact of New Public Management on Comparative Public Administration
New Public Management (NPM) emerged in the late 20th century as a reform movement aimed at enhancing the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of public sector organizations. Here's how NPM has impacted comparative public administration:
1. Emphasis on Performance and Results
NPM advocates for a shift from input-based to output-based measures of performance, emphasizing results and outcomes rather than processes and activities. This focus on performance has influenced comparative public administration by promoting the adoption of performance-based management practices across different countries and administrative systems.
2. Decentralization and Devolution
NPM promotes decentralization and devolution of decision-making authority and responsibility to lower levels of government or non-governmental organizations. This has led to variations in administrative structures and processes across different countries, reflecting local preferences, capacities, and contexts.
3. Marketization and Competition
NPM encourages the introduction of market-like mechanisms, such as competition, contracting, and outsourcing, into the public sector. This has prompted comparative public administrators to explore alternative service delivery models and partnerships with the private and nonprofit sectors to improve efficiency and innovation.
4. Managerialism and Leadership
NPM emphasizes the adoption of private sector management techniques and principles in public sector organizations, promoting a more managerialist approach to governance. Comparative public administrators have sought to learn from and adapt managerial practices from different countries to address common challenges and improve organizational performance.
5. Accountability and Transparency
NPM emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency in public sector governance, promoting mechanisms such as performance measurement, public reporting, and citizen engagement. This has influenced comparative public administration by encouraging the adoption of accountability mechanisms and practices that are tailored to local contexts and needs.
Impact of New Public Service on Comparative Public Administration
New Public Service (NPS) emerged as a response to the perceived shortcomings of NPM, advocating for a greater emphasis on public values, citizenship, and democratic governance. Here's how NPS has impacted comparative public administration:
1. Focus on Public Values and Citizenship
NPS emphasizes the importance of public values, such as equity, fairness, and social justice, in shaping public sector policies and practices. This has led to greater attention to issues of social inclusion, human rights, and democratic participation in comparative public administration, reflecting diverse cultural and political contexts.
2. Collaborative Governance and Networks
NPS promotes collaborative governance and networks, encouraging partnerships between government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and community groups to address complex social problems. This has influenced comparative public administration by fostering cross-sectoral collaboration and innovation in policy development and implementation.
3. Citizen-Centered Service Delivery
NPS advocates for citizen-centered approaches to service delivery, prioritizing the needs and preferences of citizens in the design and delivery of public services. This has prompted comparative public administrators to explore new ways of engaging with citizens, such as participatory decision-making processes and digital platforms for feedback and communication.
4. Public Sector Leadership and Values
NPS emphasizes the importance of public sector leadership that is grounded in ethical values and a commitment to the public interest. This has influenced comparative public administration by promoting leadership development programs, integrity initiatives, and codes of conduct that uphold principles of accountability, transparency, and integrity.
5. Democratic Governance and Accountability
NPS underscores the importance of democratic governance and accountability in public sector organizations, promoting mechanisms such as citizen oversight, open government, and democratic deliberation. This has influenced comparative public administration by encouraging the adoption of democratic governance practices that reflect local contexts and values.
Impact of Comparative Public Policy on Comparative Public Administration
Comparative public policy involves the analysis of policy choices, processes, and outcomes across different countries and contexts. Here's how comparative public policy has impacted comparative public administration:
1. Learning from Best Practices
Comparative public policy facilitates the identification and dissemination of best practices in policy design, implementation, and evaluation. Comparative public administrators draw insights from successful policy experiences in other countries to inform their own policy decisions and strategies.
2. Understanding Policy Transfer and Diffusion
Comparative public policy helps to understand the processes of policy transfer and diffusion across borders, as policies and ideas are adopted, adapted, and implemented in different contexts. This enables comparative public administrators to assess the feasibility and appropriateness of policy solutions from other countries.
3. Analyzing Policy Impacts and Outcomes
Comparative public policy enables the analysis of policy impacts and outcomes in different countries, providing insights into the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of public policies. This informs evidence-based decision-making and policy evaluation in comparative public administration.
4. Addressing Global Challenges
Comparative public policy allows for the examination of global challenges, such as climate change, migration, and terrorism, and the development of coordinated policy responses. This encourages collaboration and cooperation between countries to address shared challenges and achieve common goals.
5. Promoting Policy Innovation
Comparative public policy fosters policy innovation by exposing policymakers and administrators to diverse policy approaches and solutions from around the world. This encourages experimentation, adaptation, and learning in comparative public administration, leading to the development of innovative policy responses to complex societal problems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, New Public Management, New Public Service, and Comparative Public Policy have each had significant impacts on Comparative Public Administration, shaping administrative practices, governance structures, and policy choices across different countries and contexts. By understanding and analyzing these influences, comparative public administrators can better navigate the complexities of governance and policy-making in an increasingly interconnected world.
See less