Home/EHI-01

Abstract Classes Latest Questions

N.K. Sharma
N.K. Sharma
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Explain Non-Aligned Movement.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) is a political forum founded in 1961, primarily by leaders from newly independent countries who sought to maintain their neutrality and independence during the Cold War. The movement aimed to create a group of nations that would not align with either the Western bloc (Read more

    The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) is a political forum founded in 1961, primarily by leaders from newly independent countries who sought to maintain their neutrality and independence during the Cold War. The movement aimed to create a group of nations that would not align with either the Western bloc (led by the United States) or the Eastern bloc (led by the Soviet Union).

    Key principles of the Non-Aligned Movement include advocating for peace, sovereignty, and non-interference in the internal affairs of nations. NAM aimed to promote economic development, social justice, and equality in the global order. Founding members included leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru of India, Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt, and Josip Broz Tito of Yugoslavia.

    Despite evolving geopolitical dynamics and the end of the Cold War, NAM continued to exist, attracting a diverse group of member nations. Over the years, NAM has addressed issues such as disarmament, human rights, and economic development, promoting a multipolar world order and fostering cooperation among nations that choose not to align with major power blocs.

    See less
    • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Explain Telengana movement.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Telangana movement refers to the socio-political movement for the creation of a separate state of Telangana from the existing state of Andhra Pradesh in India. The demand for Telangana was primarily based on issues related to regional disparities, economic neglect, and concerns about political rRead more

    The Telangana movement refers to the socio-political movement for the creation of a separate state of Telangana from the existing state of Andhra Pradesh in India. The demand for Telangana was primarily based on issues related to regional disparities, economic neglect, and concerns about political representation.

    The movement gained momentum in the early 2000s, with activists and political leaders advocating for the formation of a separate state to address the perceived marginalization of the Telangana region. Proponents argued that a separate state would lead to more focused development, improved governance, and better representation for the people of Telangana.

    The movement witnessed mass protests, strikes, and political agitation. The Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS), led by K. Chandrashekar Rao, played a key role in advocating for the cause. After years of intense agitation and political negotiations, the Indian government, in 2014, announced the formation of the separate state of Telangana, comprising ten districts of the northern region of Andhra Pradesh. The creation of Telangana marked a significant development in Indian federalism and regional aspirations.

    See less
    • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Explain Rowlatt Act.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Rowlatt Act, officially known as the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919, was a repressive legislation passed by the British colonial government in India during the aftermath of World War I. Named after its sponsor, Sir Sidney Rowlatt, the Act was enacted on March 21, 1919. The RowlaRead more

    The Rowlatt Act, officially known as the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919, was a repressive legislation passed by the British colonial government in India during the aftermath of World War I. Named after its sponsor, Sir Sidney Rowlatt, the Act was enacted on March 21, 1919.

    The Rowlatt Act aimed to empower the colonial authorities to combat revolutionary activities by allowing for the arrest and detention of individuals without trial and the imposition of stricter control over the press. It granted the government the authority to imprison any person suspected of involvement in revolutionary or seditious activities without presenting the evidence in court.

    The Act sparked widespread protests and opposition across India, as it was perceived as a severe infringement on civil liberties and a violation of the principles of justice. The discontent culminated in the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar on April 13, 1919, when British troops fired on a peaceful gathering, resulting in numerous casualties. The Rowlatt Act fueled the momentum of the Indian independence movement, leading to intensified protests and eventually the demand for complete self-rule.

    See less
    • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Explain Azad Hind Fauj (Indian National Army).

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Azad Hind Fauj, also known as the Indian National Army (INA), was a military force formed during World War II with the aim of liberating India from British colonial rule. Led by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, the INA played a crucial role in the Indian independence movement. Subhas Chandra Bose, whRead more

    The Azad Hind Fauj, also known as the Indian National Army (INA), was a military force formed during World War II with the aim of liberating India from British colonial rule. Led by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, the INA played a crucial role in the Indian independence movement.

    Subhas Chandra Bose, who had sought international support for India's independence, aligned with Axis powers and established the Azad Hind Government in Singapore in 1943. The INA comprised Indian prisoners of war and civilians living in Southeast Asia. It engaged in military campaigns alongside the Japanese forces.

    The INA's notable campaigns include the Imphal-Kohima offensive in 1944. However, the tide of the war turned against the Axis powers, leading to the INA's eventual defeat. Despite this, the INA's efforts had a significant impact on the psyche of the Indian population and the British administration. The trials of INA personnel, notably the Red Fort Trials in 1945, became a turning point in India's struggle for independence, contributing to the eventual withdrawal of the British and the establishment of an independent India in 1947.

    See less
    • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Discuss the details of the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, also known as the Government of India Act 1919, represented an attempt by the British government to address constitutional issues in India and introduce a limited form of self-government. The reforms were formulated by the Secretary of State for India, Edwin Montagu,Read more

    The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, also known as the Government of India Act 1919, represented an attempt by the British government to address constitutional issues in India and introduce a limited form of self-government. The reforms were formulated by the Secretary of State for India, Edwin Montagu, and the then Viceroy of India, Lord Chelmsford. The key details of the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms are as follows:

    1. Diarchy in Provinces:

      • The most significant feature of the reforms was the introduction of the diarchy system in the provinces. Under diarchy, certain subjects such as finance, law and order, and public health were transferred to Indian ministers responsible to the provincial legislative council. However, crucial areas like revenue and police remained under the direct control of the British-appointed governor.

    2. Bicameral Legislature at the Centre:

      • The central legislative council was transformed into a bicameral legislature with two houses – the Legislative Assembly (elected by the public) and the Council of State (partially elected, partially nominated). The powers of these bodies were limited, and the real authority still rested with the British government.

    3. Expansion of Electorate:

      • The franchise was expanded, allowing a larger number of Indians to participate in the electoral process. However, the voting rights were tied to property qualifications, which limited the representation of the masses.

    4. Separate Electorates:

      • The system of separate electorates for Muslims was continued, providing for a communal representation that furthered the divide between Hindus and Muslims.

    5. Central Public Service Commission:

      • The establishment of a Central Public Service Commission aimed at regulating civil service appointments, fostering a more impartial recruitment process.

    6. Reserved Seats:

      • A certain number of seats were reserved for marginalized communities, including the Scheduled Castes (Depressed Classes) and Anglo-Indians.

    7. Introduction of Responsible Government:

      • The reforms laid the foundation for the concept of "responsible government" at the provincial level, whereby elected ministers were responsible to the legislative council.

    8. Retention of Control:

      • Despite the introduction of some elements of self-government, key powers and decision-making authority remained vested in the British government and the Viceroy.

    While the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms were a step towards devolution of power, they fell short of meeting Indian aspirations for complete self-rule. The introduction of diarchy and retention of control by the British government failed to satisfy the demand for Swaraj (self-governance), eventually paving the way for more extensive constitutional changes in the subsequent years.

    See less
    • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

What were the Cripps Proposals? Why did the Congress reject them?

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Cripps Proposals, officially known as the "Statement by His Majesty's Government," were a set of proposals presented by Sir Stafford Cripps, a senior British politician, to address constitutional issues and secure Indian cooperation in the British war effort during World War II. TRead more

    The Cripps Proposals, officially known as the "Statement by His Majesty's Government," were a set of proposals presented by Sir Stafford Cripps, a senior British politician, to address constitutional issues and secure Indian cooperation in the British war effort during World War II. The proposals were made in 1942, during a critical juncture in the war when the British sought Indian support in exchange for political concessions. The key features of the Cripps Proposals included:

    1. Dominion Status:

      • The proposals offered the possibility of India achieving Dominion Status after the war, with the right to secede from the British Commonwealth if it so desired.

    2. Constituent Assembly:

      • A Constituent Assembly was to be convened after the war to draft a new constitution for India. The assembly would have representatives from British India, the princely states, and minority groups.

    3. Right of Provinces to Opt Out:

      • Provinces were given the option to opt out of the proposed union and remain separate if they wished.

    4. Defence Commitments:

      • In return for Indian cooperation in the war effort, the British pledged to provide constitutional arrangements for self-government.

    Despite these provisions, the Indian National Congress, led by Mahatma Gandhi, rejected the Cripps Proposals for several reasons:

    1. Lack of Simultaneity:

      • The Congress demanded an immediate transfer of power and complete independence. The Cripps Proposals, however, promised Dominion Status only after the war, creating a time lag that the Congress found unacceptable.

    2. Vagueness and Ambiguity:

      • The proposals were criticized for being vague and lacking a clear commitment to post-war political arrangements. The Congress sought concrete and immediate steps towards self-rule.

    3. Exclusion of Princely States:

      • The proposals did not ensure the inclusion of princely states in the proposed union. The Congress, advocating for a united India, was dissatisfied with the exclusion of the princely states from the Constituent Assembly.

    4. Failure to Address Socio-Economic Issues:

      • The proposals failed to address socio-economic issues and did not provide solutions to problems such as land reforms and social justice, which were central to the Congress's vision for India.

    5. Ambiguous Stand on Viceroy's Powers:

      • The Cripps Proposals did not clarify the extent of the Viceroy's powers during the transitional period, leading to concerns about continued British control.

    The rejection of the Cripps Proposals marked a crucial moment in India's struggle for independence, as it reflected the Congress's insistence on immediate and complete self-rule rather than conditional promises for the future. The failure of the Cripps Mission set the stage for subsequent developments, including the Quit India Movement of 1942 and the eventual realization of Indian independence in 1947.

    See less
    • 0
N.K. Sharma
N.K. Sharma
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Discuss the role of the Indian state in promoting industrialisation after 1947.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    After gaining independence in 1947, the Indian state played a central role in promoting industrialization as a crucial component of economic development. The government recognized the need for rapid industrial growth to address issues of poverty, unemployment, and to strengthen the overall economy.Read more

    After gaining independence in 1947, the Indian state played a central role in promoting industrialization as a crucial component of economic development. The government recognized the need for rapid industrial growth to address issues of poverty, unemployment, and to strengthen the overall economy. Several key initiatives were undertaken to foster industrialization:

    1. Five-Year Plans:

      • The Indian government formulated a series of Five-Year Plans, starting in 1951, to outline strategies for economic development. These plans emphasized industrialization as a priority sector, setting targets for the growth of various industries.

    2. Public Sector Initiatives:

      • The government actively engaged in establishing public sector enterprises to spearhead industrial development. Industries deemed strategically important or requiring massive capital investments were taken up by the state. This included sectors such as steel (SAIL), oil and gas (ONGC), heavy machinery (BHEL), and more.

    3. Industrial Policy Resolutions:

      • Industrial Policy Resolutions were formulated to guide the overall direction of industrial development. The first Industrial Policy Resolution in 1948 aimed at achieving a socialist pattern of society, focusing on state ownership and control of key industries.

    4. Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI):

      • The government pursued Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) as a strategy to reduce dependence on foreign imports. Protective measures, including tariffs and import restrictions, were implemented to encourage the growth of domestic industries.

    5. Licensing and Regulation:

      • The industrial licensing policy was introduced to regulate and control private sector industrial activities. The government issued licenses for setting up industries, determining the scale of production, and controlling the allocation of resources.

    6. Technology and Skill Development:

      • Efforts were made to enhance technological capabilities and skill development through institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and the National Institutes of Technology (NITs). These institutions played a crucial role in training the workforce for the industrial sector.

    7. Green Revolution and Agricultural Linkages:

      • The Green Revolution, initiated in the 1960s, aimed at increasing agricultural productivity. Improved agricultural practices and technologies not only transformed the agricultural sector but also generated a surplus for the industrial sector.

    8. Liberalization in 1991:

      • In 1991, India undertook significant economic reforms, liberalizing various sectors, including industry. The government opened up the economy to foreign investment, reduced trade barriers, and initiated a shift towards a more market-oriented approach.

    While the state-led industrialization contributed to the growth of the industrial sector, it also faced challenges, including inefficiencies, bureaucratic hurdles, and a lack of competitiveness. The economic reforms of 1991 marked a turning point, introducing market-oriented policies and a greater role for the private sector in driving industrial growth.

    See less
    • 0
Abstract Classes
Abstract ClassesPower Elite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Explain the reasons behind the partition of India.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The partition of India in 1947 was a complex and deeply consequential event that resulted in the creation of two independent nations, India and Pakistan. Several interconnected factors contributed to this partition: Religious Divide: The communal tensions between Hindus and Muslims played a pivotalRead more

    The partition of India in 1947 was a complex and deeply consequential event that resulted in the creation of two independent nations, India and Pakistan. Several interconnected factors contributed to this partition:

    1. Religious Divide:

      • The communal tensions between Hindus and Muslims played a pivotal role. The demand for a separate nation for Muslims, known as Pakistan, was driven by concerns about safeguarding the political and economic rights of the Muslim minority in a Hindu-majority India. The idea of separate electorates and the two-nation theory, articulated by Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the All India Muslim League, emphasized the distinct identities of Hindus and Muslims.

    2. British Policy:

      • The British colonial policy of 'divide and rule' exacerbated religious and communal differences to maintain control. The communal award and the formation of separate electorates for Hindus and Muslims further deepened the religious divide.

    3. Congress-League Differences:

      • The inability of the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League to reach a consensus on power-sharing and the structure of the future government contributed to the demand for a separate Muslim state. The Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946 failed to reconcile the differences between the two major political parties.

    4. Economic Disparities:

      • Economic disparities between the Hindu-majority areas and Muslim-majority areas also played a role. Muslims, especially in regions like Punjab and Bengal, were concerned about economic and political marginalization in a united India.

    5. Violence and Communal Riots:

      • The communal riots and violence that erupted during the post-World War II period intensified communal tensions. The Direct Action Day on August 16, 1946, witnessed widespread violence between Hindus and Muslims in Calcutta, setting the stage for further divisions.

    6. Radcliffe Line and Boundary Demarcation:

      • The Radcliffe Line, drawn by Sir Cyril Radcliffe, demarcated the borders between India and Pakistan. The hastily drawn boundary resulted in the division of provinces with mixed populations, leading to mass migrations and communal violence during the partition.

    7. Role of Leadership:

      • The leadership of figures like Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who championed the cause of a separate Muslim state, and the failure of leaders to bridge the communal divide contributed to the partition. Attempts by Mahatma Gandhi and others to prevent the partition were hindered by the deep-rooted mistrust and animosity.

    The partition of India resulted in significant human tragedy, with mass migrations, communal violence, and loss of life on an unprecedented scale. The consequences of the partition continue to shape the geopolitical landscape of South Asia, influencing the relations between India and Pakistan to this day.

    See less
    • 0
N.K. Sharma
N.K. Sharma
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

What connections existed between the Non-Cooperation movement and the Khilafat movement?

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement were two distinct yet interconnected movements in India during the early 20th century, both striving for common objectives against British colonial rule. The association between these movements was primarily forged through shared goals and a senRead more

    The Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement were two distinct yet interconnected movements in India during the early 20th century, both striving for common objectives against British colonial rule. The association between these movements was primarily forged through shared goals and a sense of solidarity among the Indian Muslim community and the larger nationalist movement. Here are the key ways in which they were associated:

    1. Anti-British Sentiment:

      • Both movements were united by a common anti-British sentiment. The Khilafat Movement originated as a response to the perceived injustices against the Ottoman Caliphate by the Allied powers after World War I. Muslims in India felt a sense of solidarity with the global Muslim community, and this sentiment aligned with the broader discontent against British rule.

    2. Non-Cooperation Strategy:

      • The Khilafat leaders, including Ali brothers – Maulana Muhammad Ali and Maulana Shaukat Ali, collaborated with Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress in the Non-Cooperation Movement. The idea was to collectively protest against British policies by refusing to cooperate with the colonial authorities.

    3. Joint Mass Protests:

      • The Khilafat leaders and the Congress jointly organized mass protests and demonstrations against British rule. The participation of both Hindu and Muslim communities in these protests reflected a united front against colonial oppression.

    4. Boycott of British Goods and Institutions:

      • As part of the Non-Cooperation Movement, Indians were encouraged to boycott British goods, institutions, and educational establishments. The Khilafat leaders actively supported and participated in these boycotts, reinforcing the unity of purpose.

    5. Formation of the All-India Khilafat Committee:

      • The All-India Khilafat Committee was formed in 1919 to coordinate the Khilafat Movement in India. In 1920, this committee joined forces with the Indian National Congress in supporting the Non-Cooperation Movement, forming a formidable alliance.

    6. Unified Mass Movement:

      • The collaboration between the Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement transformed the anti-British struggle into a mass movement that cut across religious lines. Hindus and Muslims, under the banner of these movements, participated in protests, strikes, and non-cooperation activities together.

    7. Joint Demands:

      • The Khilafat leaders and the Congress presented a set of common demands, including the redressal of Khilafat-related issues and the granting of self-rule to India. The unity of purpose strengthened the overall impact of their demands on the British administration.

    However, the Khilafat-Non-Cooperation alliance faced challenges and eventually weakened due to differences in strategies and the violent incidents during the Chauri Chaura incident in 1922. Despite this, the association between the Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement marked a significant phase of Hindu-Muslim unity in the broader struggle for Indian independence.

    See less
    • 0
Abstract Classes
Abstract ClassesPower Elite Author
Asked: February 18, 2024In:

Write a note on the Swadeshi Movement in Bengal.

EHI-01
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author

    The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal was a significant chapter in India's struggle for independence, marked by widespread protests, economic resistance, and a call for self-reliance. The movement emerged as a response to the partition of Bengal by the British in 1905, a controversial decision that aRead more

    The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal was a significant chapter in India's struggle for independence, marked by widespread protests, economic resistance, and a call for self-reliance. The movement emerged as a response to the partition of Bengal by the British in 1905, a controversial decision that aimed to divide the province along religious lines for administrative convenience. The Swadeshi Movement had profound socio-economic and political implications:

    1. Partition of Bengal (1905):

      • The British decision to partition Bengal was met with widespread opposition as it was perceived as a deliberate attempt to sow religious discord and weaken the nationalist movement.
      • The province was divided along religious lines, creating East Bengal and Assam with a Muslim majority and West Bengal with a Hindu majority. The intent was to create religious divisions and weaken nationalist sentiments.

    2. Call for Swadeshi:

      • The leaders of the Indian National Congress, including prominent figures like Aurobindo Ghosh, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, called for the adoption of Swadeshi, advocating the use of Indian-made goods and the boycott of British goods.

    3. Boycott and Economic Resistance:

      • The Swadeshi Movement gained momentum with the widespread boycott of British goods. People began to discard foreign-made clothes, salt, and other products, replacing them with locally produced alternatives.
      • Bonfires of British goods, especially Manchester cloth, became symbolic acts of protest, demonstrating the rejection of foreign-made items.

    4. Promotion of Swadeshi Industries:

      • The movement encouraged the establishment and promotion of Swadeshi industries to reduce dependence on British goods. Cottage industries, handloom weaving, and small-scale enterprises flourished as people actively sought alternatives to imported products.

    5. Cultural and Educational Renaissance:

      • The Swadeshi Movement was not just an economic protest; it also sparked a cultural and educational renaissance. Efforts were made to revive indigenous arts, crafts, and educational institutions that promoted Indian values and traditions.

    6. Suppression by the British:

      • The British responded to the Swadeshi Movement with repression and arrests. Leaders were imprisoned, and the British attempted to suppress the nationalist fervor by curtailing civil liberties.

    7. Impact and Legacy:

      • The Swadeshi Movement had a profound impact on India's struggle for independence. It laid the groundwork for a more assertive and self-reliant approach, fostering a sense of national pride and unity.
      • The movement also marked the beginning of mass participation in the freedom struggle, with people from various backgrounds actively contributing to the cause.

    The Swadeshi Movement, born out of the opposition to the partition of Bengal, evolved into a powerful force that inspired similar movements across the country. It laid the foundation for the larger anti-colonial struggle, emphasizing the importance of economic self-sufficiency, cultural revival, and collective action in the pursuit of national freedom.

    See less
    • 0