What do you think is the dominant quality of Hamlet’s character? Discuss with suitable examples.
1. Introduction to Pygmalion as a Romance George Bernard Shawâs Pygmalion, published in 1913, is a play that defies many of the conventions of traditional romantic dramas. Set against the backdrop of early 20th-century England, it tells the story of Henry Higgins, a phonetics professor, and Eliza DoRead more
1. Introduction to Pygmalion as a Romance
George Bernard Shawâs Pygmalion, published in 1913, is a play that defies many of the conventions of traditional romantic dramas. Set against the backdrop of early 20th-century England, it tells the story of Henry Higgins, a phonetics professor, and Eliza Doolittle, a flower girl who undergoes a dramatic transformation under his tutelage. Although Pygmalion has often been interpreted as a romantic comedy, Shaw deliberately subverts typical romantic tropes, making the play a complex commentary on class, language, and identity. By discussing the play as a romance, it is necessary to explore both its adherence to and deviation from romantic conventions. Shaw engages with the idea of romance but does so in a non-traditional way, challenging the audience's expectations of relationships and transformations.
2. The Classical Pygmalion Myth and Romance Elements
To understand Pygmalion as a romance, it is essential to refer to its mythological roots. The play's title refers to the ancient Greek myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who falls in love with a statue he carves. In the myth, Pygmalion becomes so enamored with his creation that he wishes for it to come to life, and the goddess Aphrodite grants his wish. This myth, filled with romantic notions of love, transformation, and idealized beauty, provides the basis for Shawâs play. However, while the classical myth revolves around a romantic union between the artist and his creation, Shawâs Pygmalion does not lead to a conventional love story between its two central characters, Higgins and Eliza.
The romance in Shawâs version lies more in the transformation of Eliza rather than in a romantic entanglement. Just like in the myth, Eliza is âcreatedâ or transformed by Henry Higgins, who reshapes her through education and language. The romance, therefore, is not between the two protagonists in a conventional sense, but in the process of self-realization and the metaphorical âcoming to lifeâ of Eliza as an independent and assertive individual.
3. The Non-Traditional Romantic Relationship Between Higgins and Eliza
The relationship between Henry Higgins and Eliza Doolittle is the heart of the play, but it is far from a traditional romantic pairing. While there are hints of mutual dependence and affection, Shaw purposefully avoids the conventional trajectory of romantic relationships. Throughout the play, Higgins is depicted as arrogant, insensitive, and emotionally detached. His treatment of Eliza is often dismissive, viewing her as an experiment rather than a human being with feelings and desires. His lack of emotional depth makes him an unlikely romantic hero.
Eliza, on the other hand, evolves from a flower girl to a confident woman who understands her own value. Her transformation is not just a result of Higginsâ teachings but also her own determination and resilience. As she becomes more self-assured, the dynamics between her and Higgins shift. While traditional romance would expect the two characters to fall in love by the end of the play, Shaw denies the audience this resolution. Instead, Eliza asserts her independence, rejecting the notion of becoming a passive recipient of Higginsâ affections. This deliberate subversion of romantic expectations challenges the traditional notion of romance, emphasizing personal growth and independence over romantic union.
4. The Role of Colonel Pickering as a Romantic Foil
Colonel Pickering, a secondary character in the play, serves as a romantic foil to Henry Higgins. Where Higgins is brusque and dismissive, Pickering is kind, considerate, and respectful toward Eliza. Throughout her transformation, it is Pickeringâs gentle manner and acknowledgment of Elizaâs dignity that help her realize her own worth. In contrast to Higgins, who sees Eliza as a project, Pickering treats her like a lady from the beginning. This contrast highlights a more traditional form of romance that values respect, kindness, and mutual admiration.
Pickeringâs role, however, remains platonic and fatherly rather than romantic. While he represents qualities traditionally associated with romance, Shaw once again subverts expectations by keeping his relationship with Eliza non-romantic. His character underscores the theme of respect and recognition of oneâs humanity, values that Eliza comes to demand from everyone, including Higgins. Pickeringâs presence in the play adds complexity to the theme of romance, emphasizing that genuine affection and care need not be romantic in nature.
5. Elizaâs Romantic Transformation: Beyond Love
The central transformation of Pygmalion is not Higginsâ or Pickeringâs, but Elizaâs. Her evolution from a poor flower girl with a thick Cockney accent to a poised, articulate woman is the play's primary romantic narrative. This transformation, while orchestrated by Higgins, becomes a romance of self-discovery for Eliza. As she learns to speak properly and presents herself as a lady, she also begins to realize her potential, identity, and independence.
Unlike traditional romance plots, Elizaâs transformation is not motivated by love or a desire to win over a suitor. Rather, it is driven by her need for self-respect and agency. By the end of the play, she no longer needs Higgins, and she expresses a desire to leave him and marry Freddy Eynsford-Hill, a young man who has shown her affection. Yet, even this potential romantic relationship is downplayed. Freddy, unlike Higgins, loves Eliza, but he is depicted as weak and ineffectual. The romantic subplot with Freddy remains understated, as Shaw emphasizes Elizaâs independence over her romantic affiliations.
6. The Rejection of a Romantic Ending
One of the most significant ways in which Pygmalion diverges from traditional romance is through its ending. Unlike the classical Pygmalion myth, where the sculptor and his creation unite in love, Shawâs play denies a romantic resolution between Higgins and Eliza. While there are moments of affection and tension between the two, Eliza ultimately rejects the idea of staying with Higgins, refusing to be subservient to him or to remain under his influence. She declares her intent to make her own way in the world, whether that involves marrying Freddy or not.
Shawâs refusal to give the audience a traditional romantic ending reflects his critique of romantic conventions. He resists the idea that a womanâs worth is tied to her relationship with a man or that romance must culminate in a union. Instead, Shaw portrays Eliza as a woman who has come into her own, rejecting the conventional narrative of romantic dependency. This subversion of the romantic genre forces the audience to rethink what romance can mean, focusing not on romantic love but on personal growth, freedom, and autonomy.
7. The Social and Intellectual Romance of Pygmalion
Beyond its exploration of personal relationships, Pygmalion can also be viewed as a romance between language, class, and identity. The play explores how speech and manners can shape an individual's social standing and self-perception. For Higgins, language is a tool of power and control, while for Eliza, it becomes a means of liberation. Their interactions are not just about personal transformation but also about navigating the rigid class structures of Edwardian England.
The romantic notion of transformation and self-improvement is central to the play, but it is framed within the larger context of social mobility and class distinctions. The romance in Pygmalion is not just between individuals but between ideas â the idea that identity can be shaped and reshaped through education and social interaction. In this sense, Pygmalion is a romance of the mind as much as of the heart, with language serving as the key to personal and social evolution.
Conclusion
In Pygmalion, George Bernard Shaw plays with the conventions of romance, both embracing and subverting them to explore themes of transformation, identity, and independence. While the play is rooted in the romantic tradition of transformation, it rejects traditional romantic resolutions, particularly the idea of romantic union between Higgins and Eliza. Instead, Shaw presents a romance of personal growth and intellectual awakening, with Eliza's transformation standing at the heart of the narrative. In doing so, Pygmalion offers a fresh, thought-provoking take on the romance genre, emphasizing independence and self-discovery over conventional romantic relationships.
See less
1. Introduction William Shakespeare's Hamlet is widely regarded as one of the most complex characters in literature. His multifaceted nature has been analyzed by scholars and audiences for centuries. Hamletâs character is a rich tapestry of emotional depth, philosophical reflection, and internaRead more
1. Introduction
William Shakespeare's Hamlet is widely regarded as one of the most complex characters in literature. His multifaceted nature has been analyzed by scholars and audiences for centuries. Hamletâs character is a rich tapestry of emotional depth, philosophical reflection, and internal conflict. One of the most dominant qualities that defines Hamlet is his profound indecisiveness. This trait, more than any other, drives the play's tragic trajectory. Throughout the play, Hamlet's inability to act decisively becomes apparent as he grapples with questions of morality, revenge, and the consequences of action versus inaction.
2. Hamletâs Intellectual and Philosophical Nature
From the outset, Hamlet is portrayed as a deeply intellectual character. His penchant for reflection and philosophical musings is evident in his soliloquies, where he contemplates the nature of life, death, and existence. Hamlet's intellectualism often prevents him from taking swift action. For instance, in the famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy, Hamlet ponders the value of life and the fear of the unknown in death. His contemplation of suicide reflects his tendency to overthink rather than act impulsively. This constant reflection creates a paralysis within Hamlet, rendering him incapable of making decisions swiftly. His intelligence becomes a double-edged sword, allowing him to grasp the weight of his decisions but also trapping him in an endless cycle of thought.
3. Hamletâs Indecisiveness as a Dominant Quality
Perhaps the most prominent trait of Hamletâs character is his indecision. Throughout the play, he is faced with numerous opportunities to avenge his fatherâs death, yet he hesitates repeatedly. This indecisiveness is linked to his overthinking nature, where he weighs the moral and ethical consequences of every possible action. After learning from the ghost of his father that King Claudius was responsible for his murder, Hamlet vows revenge but struggles to follow through. Even when he has the chance to kill Claudius while he is praying, Hamlet refrains, rationalizing that killing Claudius in a state of repentance would send him to heaven, which Hamlet deems an inappropriate fate for a murderer. This moment of hesitation illustrates Hamlet's inability to act decisively, ultimately prolonging the cycle of revenge and leading to further tragedy.
4. The Psychological Struggle of Hamlet
Hamletâs indecisiveness is not simply a matter of procrastination; it stems from his deep psychological turmoil. His grief over his father's death and his disgust at his motherâs quick remarriage to Claudius weigh heavily on him. These emotional struggles exacerbate his inability to take action. Hamletâs mind is torn between competing desires: the duty to avenge his father and his fear of the moral and spiritual consequences of such an act. This psychological battle is exemplified in his erratic behavior throughout the play, where he swings from moments of intense anger and resolve to periods of deep melancholy and reflection. His famous line, "O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I!" encapsulates his frustration with his own inaction. Hamlet sees himself as cowardly for not avenging his father sooner, but his internal conflict prevents him from acting.
5. Hamletâs Use of Feigned Madness
To mask his true intentions and buy himself time, Hamlet adopts an appearance of madness. While his madness is a calculated act, it also highlights his indecisiveness. By pretending to be insane, Hamlet is able to delay his revenge under the guise of instability. However, this act of madness becomes another form of avoidance. Rather than confronting Claudius directly, Hamlet hides behind his feigned madness, allowing him to sidestep the difficult decisions he must make. This behavior further reveals Hamlet's inability to confront his emotions and responsibilities head-on, as he continues to wrestle with the consequences of his actions.
6. Hamlet's Moral and Ethical Dilemmas
Central to Hamlet's indecisiveness is his concern with morality and ethics. Unlike typical revenge tragedies, where the protagonist is single-minded in their quest for vengeance, Hamlet is deeply conflicted about the righteousness of revenge. His Christian beliefs make him question the moral consequences of murder. He is not only concerned with avenging his father but also with the spiritual implications of taking a life. This ethical quandary slows Hamlet's decision-making process as he grapples with questions of sin, justice, and the afterlife. The scene in which Hamlet debates whether to kill Claudius while he is praying reflects this internal struggle. Hamlet is torn between his duty to his father and his fear of committing an unjust act, showcasing his deep moral concerns.
7. Hamletâs Relationships and Their Influence on His Indecision
The relationships Hamlet shares with other characters also play a significant role in shaping his indecisiveness. His complicated relationship with his mother, Gertrude, fuels his internal conflict. Hamlet feels betrayed by her marriage to Claudius, which contributes to his emotional and psychological instability. His interactions with Ophelia are equally fraught, as Hamlet alternates between expressing love and cruelty toward her. These turbulent relationships exacerbate Hamletâs inability to take decisive action, as they create additional emotional turmoil. Furthermore, Hamletâs close bond with Horatio stands in stark contrast to the deceit and betrayal he perceives in others. Horatio's loyalty offers Hamlet a glimpse of trust, but it is not enough to pull him out of his internal struggle.
8. Hamletâs Tragic Flaw (Hamartia)
In classical tragedy, the protagonistâs downfall is often attributed to a tragic flaw, or hamartia. For Hamlet, his tragic flaw is his indecisiveness. His inability to take decisive action ultimately leads to the play's tragic conclusion, where multiple characters, including Hamlet himself, meet untimely deaths. Hamletâs hesitation allows events to spiral out of control, culminating in a bloody finale. Had Hamlet acted swiftly upon learning of Claudiusâs treachery, much of the tragedy could have been avoided. His procrastination not only delays justice but also creates more opportunities for miscommunication, misunderstanding, and death.
9. The Impact of Hamletâs Indecision on the Playâs Outcome
Hamletâs indecision is the driving force behind the play's tragic ending. His delay in avenging his fatherâs murder creates a ripple effect, leading to the deaths of Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Gertrude, Laertes, and Claudius. Each of these deaths is indirectly or directly caused by Hamletâs inability to act at critical moments. Even his own death is a consequence of his indecision, as his delayed actions give Laertes and Claudius the opportunity to plot against him. The playâs conclusion serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of inaction, as Hamlet's fatal flaw not only costs him his life but also the lives of those around him.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Hamlet's dominant quality is his indecisiveness, a trait that both defines his character and drives the playâs tragic events. His intellectual nature, moral dilemmas, and emotional struggles contribute to his inability to act decisively, which ultimately leads to his downfall. Shakespeare masterfully portrays Hamlet as a character caught between thought and action, with his tragic flaw of indecision serving as a cautionary tale about the consequences of overthinking. Despite his noble intentions and philosophical depth, Hamletâs inability to make decisive choices renders him a tragic hero, doomed by his own inner conflict.
See less