Sign Up

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

Abstract Classes

Abstract Classes Logo Abstract Classes Logo
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Polls
  • Add group
  • Buy Points
  • Questions
  • Pending questions
  • Notifications
    • sonali10 has voted up your question.September 24, 2024 at 2:47 pm
    • Abstract Classes has answered your question.September 20, 2024 at 2:13 pm
    • The administrator approved your question.September 20, 2024 at 2:11 pm
    • banu has voted up your question.August 20, 2024 at 3:29 pm
    • banu has voted down your question.August 20, 2024 at 3:29 pm
    • Show all notifications.
  • Messages
  • User Questions
  • Asked Questions
  • Answers
  • Best Answers
Home/MGP-004/Page 4

Abstract Classes Latest Questions

Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Purity of Ends and Means.

Explain Purity of Ends and Means.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 12:01 pm

    The concept of purity of ends and means, often associated with Mahatma Gandhi, emphasizes the importance of aligning the goals or ends that one seeks to achieve with the methods or means used to achieve them. In essence, it advocates for ethical consistency and integrity in both the objectives pursuRead more

    The concept of purity of ends and means, often associated with Mahatma Gandhi, emphasizes the importance of aligning the goals or ends that one seeks to achieve with the methods or means used to achieve them. In essence, it advocates for ethical consistency and integrity in both the objectives pursued and the methods employed to attain them.

    For Gandhi, the pursuit of truth, justice, and righteousness was paramount, and he believed that the means used to achieve these goals must be in harmony with the ends themselves. He famously stated, "The means may be likened to a seed, the end to a tree; and there is just the same inviolable connection between the means and the end as there is between the seed and the tree."

    Purity of ends and means rejects the notion that noble ends justify unethical or violent means. Instead, it advocates for the use of nonviolent, ethical, and constructive methods to achieve social and political change. Gandhi believed that violence, coercion, and dishonesty only perpetuated injustice and undermined the moral foundation of one's cause.

    Moreover, purity of ends and means emphasizes the transformative power of ethical conduct and integrity in social and political struggles. Gandhi saw nonviolent resistance not only as a means to achieve specific objectives but also as a way to awaken the conscience of both oppressors and the oppressed, fostering mutual understanding, reconciliation, and healing.

    In summary, purity of ends and means is a guiding principle that underscores the importance of ethical consistency and integrity in pursuing social and political goals. It advocates for the alignment of the means used to achieve these goals with the values and principles they seek to uphold, emphasizing the transformative power of nonviolence, truth, and moral courage in creating a more just and compassionate world.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 18
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Anarchist Society.

Explain Anarchist Society.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 12:00 pm

    An anarchist society is a social and political arrangement characterized by the absence of centralized authority, hierarchy, and coercive institutions. In an anarchist society, individuals organize themselves voluntarily and collectively to meet their needs, make decisions, and govern their own affaRead more

    An anarchist society is a social and political arrangement characterized by the absence of centralized authority, hierarchy, and coercive institutions. In an anarchist society, individuals organize themselves voluntarily and collectively to meet their needs, make decisions, and govern their own affairs without the need for rulers, governments, or other forms of hierarchical control.

    Key principles of anarchist society include voluntary cooperation, mutual aid, and decentralized decision-making. Rather than relying on top-down authority or coercion, individuals in an anarchist society interact with one another based on principles of equality, autonomy, and solidarity. Decision-making processes are typically consensus-based, with all members having an equal voice and participation in shaping collective outcomes.

    Anarchist society rejects the notion of private property in the traditional sense, advocating instead for common ownership and collective stewardship of resources. This does not imply a lack of personal possessions, but rather a rejection of systems of exploitation and domination that enable some individuals to accumulate wealth and power at the expense of others.

    Anarchist society encompasses a wide range of social and economic arrangements, including syndicalism, communalism, and mutualism. These models prioritize cooperation, community self-sufficiency, and the equitable distribution of resources, while also emphasizing individual freedom and autonomy.

    Anarchist society is often characterized by its commitment to nonviolence and opposition to all forms of oppression and exploitation, including capitalism, imperialism, racism, sexism, and homophobia. Anarchists believe that hierarchical structures and coercive institutions perpetuate social injustice and inhibit human freedom, and seek to create alternative systems based on principles of equality, autonomy, and solidarity.

    In summary, an anarchist society is a vision of a decentralized, egalitarian, and self-governing community in which individuals organize themselves voluntarily and collectively to meet their needs and govern their own affairs. It emphasizes principles of cooperation, mutual aid, and nonviolence, while rejecting hierarchy, coercion, and exploitation in all its forms.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 16
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Gandhi’s view on Constitutionalism.

Explain Gandhi’s view on Constitutionalism.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:59 am

    Gandhi had a nuanced view on constitutionalism, advocating for a balance between legal frameworks and moral principles in governance. While he recognized the importance of constitutional norms and institutions in establishing the rule of law and protecting individual rights, he also believed that thRead more

    Gandhi had a nuanced view on constitutionalism, advocating for a balance between legal frameworks and moral principles in governance. While he recognized the importance of constitutional norms and institutions in establishing the rule of law and protecting individual rights, he also believed that the true strength of a society lay in its adherence to higher ethical principles such as truth, justice, and nonviolence.

    Gandhi emphasized the need for constitutionalism to be grounded in the values of morality and righteousness. He viewed constitutions not merely as legal documents, but as reflections of a society's collective conscience and moral commitments. For Gandhi, the legitimacy of a constitution depended on its alignment with universal ethical principles and its ability to promote the well-being of all members of society, particularly the most vulnerable.

    At the same time, Gandhi cautioned against an over-reliance on legalism and formalism in governance, warning that excessive adherence to legal procedures could lead to injustice and oppression. He believed that constitutions should be flexible and adaptable to changing social conditions, and that the ultimate authority rested with the moral conscience of the people rather than with legal institutions alone.

    Furthermore, Gandhi advocated for decentralized forms of governance that empowered local communities and individuals to participate directly in decision-making processes. He believed in the importance of self-governance and self-reliance, and saw local institutions as essential vehicles for promoting social justice and addressing the needs of the marginalized.

    In summary, Gandhi's view on constitutionalism emphasized the importance of balancing legal frameworks with moral principles in governance. He believed that constitutions should reflect the collective conscience of society and promote the well-being of all members, while also allowing for flexibility and adaptability to changing social conditions. Additionally, Gandhi advocated for decentralized forms of governance that empowered local communities and individuals to participate directly in decision-making processes, promoting self-governance and social justice.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 15
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Structural Violence.

Explain Structural Violence.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:58 am

    Structural violence refers to a form of violence that is embedded within the social, political, and economic structures of society, resulting in harm, deprivation, and inequality for certain groups or individuals. Unlike direct forms of violence, which involve physical harm or coercion, structural vRead more

    Structural violence refers to a form of violence that is embedded within the social, political, and economic structures of society, resulting in harm, deprivation, and inequality for certain groups or individuals. Unlike direct forms of violence, which involve physical harm or coercion, structural violence operates through systemic injustices and inequalities that are often invisible or normalized within society.

    Examples of structural violence include disparities in access to resources such as food, healthcare, education, and housing, as well as unequal treatment under the law and discriminatory social norms and practices. Structural violence can also manifest in the form of economic exploitation, environmental degradation, and institutionalized forms of discrimination based on race, gender, class, ethnicity, or other social factors.

    One key characteristic of structural violence is its persistence over time and its reproduction across generations. Structural inequalities become entrenched within social systems and institutions, perpetuating cycles of poverty, marginalization, and oppression. Moreover, structural violence often intersects with other forms of violence, exacerbating the harm experienced by marginalized groups and individuals.

    Structural violence is often perpetuated by unequal distributions of power and resources within society, which privilege certain groups while marginalizing others. Those who benefit from existing social structures may be unaware of or indifferent to the suffering experienced by marginalized groups, further reinforcing the status quo.

    Addressing structural violence requires not only addressing its immediate manifestations but also challenging the underlying systems and structures that perpetuate inequality and injustice. This may involve advocating for policy changes, redistributing resources, challenging discriminatory norms and practices, and empowering marginalized communities to advocate for their rights and interests.

    In summary, structural violence refers to the systemic injustices and inequalities embedded within social, political, and economic structures that result in harm, deprivation, and inequality for certain groups or individuals. It operates through unequal distributions of power and resources within society and is often perpetuated by discriminatory norms and practices. Addressing structural violence requires challenging the underlying systems and structures that perpetuate inequality and injustice.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 16
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Dictatorship of Proletariat.

Explain Dictatorship of Proletariat.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:57 am

    The concept of the "dictatorship of the proletariat" originates from Marxist theory and refers to a transitional phase in which the working class, or proletariat, holds political power following the overthrow of the capitalist system. In Marxist thought, the dictatorship of the proletariatRead more

    The concept of the "dictatorship of the proletariat" originates from Marxist theory and refers to a transitional phase in which the working class, or proletariat, holds political power following the overthrow of the capitalist system. In Marxist thought, the dictatorship of the proletariat is seen as a necessary step towards the establishment of a classless, communist society.

    According to Marx, under capitalism, the bourgeoisie, or capitalist class, holds power and exploits the labor of the proletariat for its own gain. The dictatorship of the proletariat represents a reversal of this power dynamic, with the working class seizing control of the state apparatus to advance its own interests and to transition society towards communism.

    In the Marxist conception, the dictatorship of the proletariat is not synonymous with dictatorship in the conventional sense. Rather than being a form of oppressive rule by a single individual or party, it is envisioned as a democratic dictatorship, in which the working class exercises political power collectively through democratic institutions such as workers' councils, or soviets.

    During the dictatorship of the proletariat, Marxists advocate for the socialization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, with the goal of abolishing private ownership of property and establishing a planned economy based on collective ownership and democratic control.

    Furthermore, the dictatorship of the proletariat is seen as a transitional phase characterized by the withering away of the state and the gradual disappearance of class distinctions. As the contradictions of capitalism are resolved and the material conditions for communism are established, the need for a state and class-based society diminishes, leading to the eventual emergence of a communist society based on the principle of "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs."

    In summary, the dictatorship of the proletariat represents a period of revolutionary transformation in which the working class seizes political power to advance towards communism. It involves the socialization of the means of production, the establishment of democratic institutions of proletarian rule, and the eventual transition to a classless, communist society.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 29
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Gandhi’s views on Imperialism.

Explain Gandhi’s views on Imperialism.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:57 am

    Gandhi vehemently opposed imperialism, viewing it as a system of oppression, exploitation, and dehumanization that violated the principles of truth, justice, and human dignity. He saw imperialism as a manifestation of greed, arrogance, and violence, driven by the pursuit of power, profit, and dominaRead more

    Gandhi vehemently opposed imperialism, viewing it as a system of oppression, exploitation, and dehumanization that violated the principles of truth, justice, and human dignity. He saw imperialism as a manifestation of greed, arrogance, and violence, driven by the pursuit of power, profit, and domination.

    Central to Gandhi's critique of imperialism was its impact on the colonized peoples, whom he saw as victims of exploitation and cultural degradation. He condemned the economic exploitation of colonies for the benefit of the imperial powers, arguing that imperialism perpetuated poverty, inequality, and dependency in the colonized regions. Gandhi believed that imperialism not only robbed colonized peoples of their resources and labor but also undermined their sense of self-worth and dignity.

    Furthermore, Gandhi criticized the moral hypocrisy of imperialism, which justified the subjugation of other peoples in the name of civilization, progress, and benevolence. He saw imperialism as a form of violence that violated the fundamental principles of nonviolence and compassion, causing immense suffering and injustice to millions of people around the world.

    Moreover, Gandhi viewed imperialism as a threat to world peace and harmony, as it fostered resentment, conflict, and division among nations and peoples. He warned that the pursuit of imperialist ambitions could lead to devastating wars and upheavals, undermining the prospects for a more just and peaceful world.

    In response to imperialism, Gandhi advocated for nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience as a means of challenging colonial rule and promoting independence and self-determination for colonized peoples. He believed in the power of truth and moral force to overcome oppression and injustice, inspiring movements for liberation and decolonization around the world.

    In summary, Gandhi's views on imperialism were rooted in his commitment to truth, justice, and human dignity. He saw imperialism as a system of exploitation and violence that violated the rights and dignity of colonized peoples, undermined world peace, and perpetuated injustice and inequality. Through his advocacy for nonviolent resistance and liberation struggles, Gandhi sought to challenge imperialism and create a more just and equitable world based on principles of mutual respect, cooperation, and solidarity.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 14
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Role of Satyagraha in Gandhian Pacifism.

Explain Role of Satyagraha in Gandhian Pacifism.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:56 am

    Satyagraha, a term coined by Mahatma Gandhi, is a philosophy and method of nonviolent resistance that lies at the heart of Gandhian pacifism. It is derived from the Sanskrit words "satya" (truth) and "agraha" (insistence), reflecting Gandhi's belief in the power of truth andRead more

    Satyagraha, a term coined by Mahatma Gandhi, is a philosophy and method of nonviolent resistance that lies at the heart of Gandhian pacifism. It is derived from the Sanskrit words "satya" (truth) and "agraha" (insistence), reflecting Gandhi's belief in the power of truth and moral force to effect social and political change.

    Central to Satyagraha is the principle of nonviolence, which Gandhi considered to be the highest form of resistance against injustice. Unlike passive resistance, which implies a lack of action or submission to oppression, Satyagraha is active, assertive, and grounded in the pursuit of truth and justice. It involves a willingness to suffer and sacrifice for one's principles, but without hatred or retaliation towards the oppressor.

    The role of Satyagraha in Gandhian pacifism is multifaceted. Firstly, it serves as a means of confronting and exposing injustice through nonviolent action. By refusing to cooperate with unjust laws or institutions, Satyagrahis seek to awaken the conscience of both the oppressor and the oppressed, ultimately leading to a change of heart and mind.

    Secondly, Satyagraha aims to transform conflict by appealing to the humanity and moral sense of the adversary. Through acts of civil disobedience, such as boycotts, strikes, and protests, Satyagrahis seek to create tension and dialogue, forcing the oppressor to confront the injustice of their actions and seek a peaceful resolution.

    Thirdly, Satyagraha fosters empowerment and self-reliance among the oppressed. By encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their own liberation and to resist oppression with courage and dignity, Satyagraha builds a sense of solidarity and collective strength, ultimately leading to social and political transformation.

    In summary, Satyagraha plays a crucial role in Gandhian pacifism as a philosophy and method of nonviolent resistance. It empowers individuals to confront injustice with courage and dignity, fosters dialogue and reconciliation, and ultimately seeks to create a more just and peaceful world based on the principles of truth, justice, and compassion.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 19
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Define Fascism.

Define Fascism.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:55 am

    Fascism is a far-right authoritarian political ideology characterized by dictatorial power, extreme nationalism, and the suppression of dissent. It emerged in early 20th-century Europe, particularly in Italy under Benito Mussolini and Germany under Adolf Hitler, and has since been associated with reRead more

    Fascism is a far-right authoritarian political ideology characterized by dictatorial power, extreme nationalism, and the suppression of dissent. It emerged in early 20th-century Europe, particularly in Italy under Benito Mussolini and Germany under Adolf Hitler, and has since been associated with regimes and movements that prioritize militarism, xenophobia, and the glorification of the nation-state.

    At its core, fascism exalts the nation or ethnic group above all else, often promoting a cult of personality around a charismatic leader who claims to embody the will of the people. It emphasizes the superiority of the nation's culture, heritage, and values, while scapegoating and demonizing marginalized groups, such as immigrants, minorities, and political dissidents, as threats to national unity and purity.

    Fascism rejects liberal democracy and pluralism, advocating for centralized authority and the suppression of political opposition through censorship, propaganda, and violence. It seeks to mobilize the masses through mass rallies, paramilitary organizations, and the cult of personality surrounding the leader, fostering a sense of collective identity and loyalty to the state.

    Economically, fascism can take various forms, but it often involves a partnership between the state and corporate interests, known as corporatism, to advance nationalist and militarist goals. While fascist regimes may maintain private ownership of property, they exert significant control over the economy through regulation, intervention, and propaganda to serve the interests of the state and the ruling elite.

    In summary, fascism is a far-right authoritarian political ideology characterized by extreme nationalism, dictatorial power, suppression of dissent, and the glorification of violence and militarism. It poses a threat to democracy, human rights, and social justice, and has historically been associated with some of the most brutal and oppressive regimes in modern history.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 16
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Gandhian Critique of Industrialisation.

Explain Gandhian Critique of Industrialisation.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:54 am

    Gandhi's critique of industrialization centered around its dehumanizing effects on individuals, communities, and the environment. He believed that the rapid expansion of industrialization, particularly in the Western model, prioritized material wealth and technological progress over human well-Read more

    Gandhi's critique of industrialization centered around its dehumanizing effects on individuals, communities, and the environment. He believed that the rapid expansion of industrialization, particularly in the Western model, prioritized material wealth and technological progress over human well-being and spiritual fulfillment.

    Firstly, Gandhi criticized industrialization for its exploitation of labor, particularly in the form of harsh working conditions, low wages, and long hours. He argued that industrialization led to the mechanization of labor, which alienated workers from the products of their labor and undermined their sense of dignity and autonomy.

    Secondly, Gandhi saw industrialization as a threat to traditional craftsmanship and cottage industries, which he viewed as essential sources of self-reliance and community resilience. He believed that the mass production methods of industrialization destroyed local economies and cultural diversity, leading to dependency on external markets and homogenization of lifestyles.

    Furthermore, Gandhi condemned the environmental degradation caused by industrialization, including pollution, resource depletion, and deforestation. He warned that the relentless pursuit of economic growth at the expense of the natural world would ultimately lead to ecological collapse and harm future generations.

    Overall, Gandhi's critique of industrialization was rooted in his vision of a society based on simplicity, self-sufficiency, and spiritual fulfillment. He advocated for decentralized, village-based economies that prioritized human-scale production, sustainable practices, and community well-being over the relentless pursuit of profit and technological advancement.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 17
  • 0
Himanshu Kulshreshtha
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: April 30, 2024In: Political Science

Explain Equality as an all-pervasive value.

Explain Equality as an all-pervasive value.

MGP-004
  1. Himanshu Kulshreshtha Elite Author
    Added an answer on April 30, 2024 at 11:53 am

    Equality as an all-pervasive value encompasses the fundamental principle that all individuals should be treated with dignity, respect, and fairness, regardless of their background, identity, or circumstances. It goes beyond mere legal or political rights to encompass social, economic, and cultural dRead more

    Equality as an all-pervasive value encompasses the fundamental principle that all individuals should be treated with dignity, respect, and fairness, regardless of their background, identity, or circumstances. It goes beyond mere legal or political rights to encompass social, economic, and cultural dimensions of human life.

    In its essence, equality dictates that every person should have equal opportunities, access to resources, and rights under the law. It rejects discrimination, prejudice, and oppression in all forms, striving to create a society where everyone has the chance to fulfill their potential and contribute meaningfully to their communities.

    Equality recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of every individual, regardless of factors such as race, gender, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, disability, or socioeconomic status. It seeks to dismantle barriers and disparities that perpetuate inequality, striving for a world where everyone has the same chances to succeed and thrive.

    Furthermore, equality extends beyond individual rights to encompass collective well-being and social justice. It calls for the redistribution of power, resources, and opportunities to address systemic injustices and ensure that marginalized groups are not left behind. It emphasizes the importance of solidarity, empathy, and compassion in building a more inclusive and equitable society.

    In summary, equality as an all-pervasive value serves as the cornerstone of a just and democratic society. It demands that we recognize and uphold the rights and dignity of every person, challenge discrimination and injustice, and work towards a world where everyone has the opportunity to live a life of dignity, freedom, and fulfillment.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 21k
  • Answers 21k
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • Pushkar Kumar

    Bachelor of Science (Honours) Anthropology (BSCANH) | IGNOU

    • 0 Comments
  • Pushkar Kumar

    Bachelor of Arts (BAM) | IGNOU

    • 0 Comments
  • Pushkar Kumar

    Bachelor of Science (BSCM) | IGNOU

    • 0 Comments
  • Pushkar Kumar

    Bachelor of Arts(Economics) (BAFEC) | IGNOU

    • 0 Comments
  • Pushkar Kumar

    Bachelor of Arts(English) (BAFEG) | IGNOU

    • 0 Comments
Academic Writing Academic Writing Help BEGS-183 BEGS-183 Solved Assignment Critical Reading Critical Reading Techniques Family & Lineage Generational Conflict Historical Fiction Hybridity & Culture IGNOU Solved Assignments IGNOU Study Guides IGNOU Writing and Study Skills Loss & Displacement Magical Realism Narrative Experimentation Nationalism & Memory Partition Trauma Postcolonial Identity Research Methods Research Skills Study Skills Writing Skills

Users

Arindom Roy

Arindom Roy

  • 102 Questions
  • 104 Answers
Manish Kumar

Manish Kumar

  • 49 Questions
  • 48 Answers
Pushkar Kumar

Pushkar Kumar

  • 57 Questions
  • 56 Answers
Gaurav

Gaurav

  • 535 Questions
  • 534 Answers
Bhulu Aich

Bhulu Aich

  • 2 Questions
  • 0 Answers
Exclusive Author
Ramakant Sharma

Ramakant Sharma

  • 8k Questions
  • 7k Answers
Ink Innovator
Himanshu Kulshreshtha

Himanshu Kulshreshtha

  • 10k Questions
  • 11k Answers
Elite Author
N.K. Sharma

N.K. Sharma

  • 930 Questions
  • 2 Answers

Explore

  • Home
  • Polls
  • Add group
  • Buy Points
  • Questions
  • Pending questions
  • Notifications
    • sonali10 has voted up your question.September 24, 2024 at 2:47 pm
    • Abstract Classes has answered your question.September 20, 2024 at 2:13 pm
    • The administrator approved your question.September 20, 2024 at 2:11 pm
    • banu has voted up your question.August 20, 2024 at 3:29 pm
    • banu has voted down your question.August 20, 2024 at 3:29 pm
    • Show all notifications.
  • Messages
  • User Questions
  • Asked Questions
  • Answers
  • Best Answers

Footer

Abstract Classes

Abstract Classes

Abstract Classes is a dynamic educational platform designed to foster a community of inquiry and learning. As a dedicated social questions & answers engine, we aim to establish a thriving network where students can connect with experts and peers to exchange knowledge, solve problems, and enhance their understanding on a wide range of subjects.

About Us

  • Meet Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • About Us

Legal Terms

  • Privacy Policy
  • Community Guidelines
  • Terms of Service
  • FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

© Abstract Classes. All rights reserved.