Comment on India’s criminalization of politics.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The criminalisation of politics in India is a deeply entrenched and concerning phenomenon that reflects the intersection of political power and criminal elements. Over the years, there has been a growing nexus between politicians and individuals with a criminal background, raising serious questions about the integrity of the democratic process and the rule of law. Here is a commentary on the criminalisation of politics in India:
1. Pervasiveness of Criminal Backgrounds:
One of the glaring aspects of criminalisation in Indian politics is the prevalence of politicians with criminal backgrounds. Many individuals facing serious criminal charges, including those related to corruption, violence, and organized crime, manage to secure political positions, often exploiting the gaps in the legal system.
2. Electoral Dynamics:
Criminalisation often finds roots in the electoral dynamics of India. Candidates with criminal backgrounds are known to exploit vulnerabilities in the political system, such as vote-bank politics, where considerations of caste, religion, or regional affiliations may take precedence over ethical and legal concerns.
3. Influence of Money and Muscle Power:
The nexus between money and muscle power plays a significant role in criminalising politics. Individuals with criminal backgrounds may have the financial means to fund election campaigns, which, in turn, can provide them with political leverage. This influence undermines the principle of a level playing field in elections.
4. Weak Legal Deterrence:
The weak legal deterrence against politicians with criminal backgrounds contributes to the persistence of this issue. Delays in the judicial process, loopholes in the legal system, and the misuse of legal provisions often allow politicians facing criminal charges to continue holding office without facing timely and effective legal consequences.
5. Erosion of Public Trust:
Criminalisation erodes public trust in the political system. When individuals with criminal backgrounds occupy positions of power, it undermines the faith of citizens in the democratic process and institutions. This erosion of trust is detrimental to the health of a vibrant and participatory democracy.
6. Impact on Governance:
The presence of politicians with criminal backgrounds can have a detrimental impact on governance. Individuals with a history of criminality may prioritize personal interests over public welfare, leading to compromised policy decisions, corruption, and a breakdown of ethical governance.
7. Electoral Reforms and Accountability:
Efforts to address the criminalisation of politics in India include proposed electoral reforms and increased accountability measures. Calls for disqualifying individuals facing serious criminal charges from contesting elections, coupled with demands for fast-tracking criminal cases against politicians, aim to enhance accountability and deterrence.
8. Civil Society Activism and Awareness:
Civil society plays a crucial role in raising awareness about the criminalisation of politics. Activist movements, media campaigns, and public discourse contribute to building awareness and pressuring authorities to take action against those with criminal backgrounds in politics.
In conclusion, the criminalisation of politics in India poses a significant challenge to the democratic ideals of transparency, accountability, and ethical governance. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive electoral reforms, a robust legal framework, and a collective societal commitment to fostering a political environment that is free from the influence of criminal elements. The continuous effort to curb this trend is essential for preserving the integrity of the democratic process and rebuilding public trust in the political institutions of the country.