Compare between Nyaya and Buddhist definitions of Perception.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Nyaya and Buddhist philosophies, though distinct, both address the concept of perception within the context of their respective epistemological frameworks.
In Nyaya:
Perception, known as "Pratyaksha," is considered one of the valid means of knowledge (Pramana). Nyaya defines perception as the direct apprehension of an object by the senses without the need for any intermediary. It involves a direct and immediate connection between the sense organs, the mind, and the external object. Nyaya recognizes various types of perception, including ordinary sense perception (Laukika Pratyaksha) and yogic perception (Yogaja Pratyaksha).
In Buddhism:
Buddhist philosophy, particularly in the Abhidharma tradition, also acknowledges perception as a means of knowledge. Perception is termed as "Sannฤ" or "Saรฑรฑฤ" in Pali. According to Buddhism, perception is part of the cognitive process that follows sensation (Vedana). It involves the mental recognition and interpretation of sensory data. The Buddhist Abhidharma tradition further categorizes perception as one of the mental factors (Cetasika) that contribute to the overall mental experience.
Comparison:
Directness of Perception:
Role in Epistemology:
Ontological Status:
In summary, both Nyaya and Buddhist philosophies recognize the role of perception in understanding the world. Nyaya emphasizes the directness of sensory perception as a standalone means of knowledge, while Buddhism incorporates perception into a broader cognitive framework, highlighting its conditioned and interpretative nature.