Critically analyse the functioning of parliamentary democracy in India.
Critically analyse the functioning of parliamentary democracy in India.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Parliamentary democracy in India, inherited from its colonial past, has been a cornerstone of the country's governance since independence. While it has contributed to the stability and resilience of India's political system, its functioning has been subject to various strengths and weaknesses. A critical analysis reveals both successes and challenges in the operation of parliamentary democracy in India.
One of the strengths of parliamentary democracy in India is its ability to accommodate diversity and represent the interests of various social, cultural, and linguistic groups. India's federal structure, with a bicameral Parliament and a multi-party system, allows for the expression of diverse viewpoints and ensures that different regions and communities have a voice in the decision-making process. This inclusivity fosters political stability and social cohesion in a country characterized by its vast diversity.
Moreover, parliamentary democracy in India provides for a system of checks and balances through the separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. While the Parliament is responsible for making laws and overseeing the functioning of the government, the judiciary acts as a guardian of the Constitution, ensuring that government actions are consistent with constitutional principles and fundamental rights. This system of checks and balances helps to prevent abuse of power and safeguard the rule of law.
Furthermore, parliamentary democracy in India has facilitated peaceful transitions of power through free and fair elections held at regular intervals. Despite occasional allegations of electoral malpractices and manipulation, India's electoral process is generally regarded as credible and participatory, allowing citizens to exercise their democratic rights and hold their representatives accountable. This electoral accountability serves as a mechanism for promoting responsive and accountable governance.
However, parliamentary democracy in India also faces several challenges that impact its functioning and effectiveness. One major challenge is the prevalence of political fragmentation and coalition politics, which often leads to unstable governments and policy gridlock. India's multi-party system, while reflective of its diverse polity, can result in weak and fragmented governments that struggle to implement coherent policies and address pressing challenges.
Moreover, the role of money and muscle power in Indian politics undermines the integrity of parliamentary democracy and erodes public trust in the political process. Electoral corruption, vote-buying, and criminalization of politics are persistent challenges that compromise the fairness and legitimacy of elections and weaken the foundations of democracy. Additionally, the influence of special interest groups and corporate interests in policymaking further distorts democratic decision-making and favors narrow vested interests over the public good.
Furthermore, parliamentary democracy in India is often criticized for its inefficiency and legislative gridlock, with Parliament frequently paralyzed by disruptions, adjournments, and filibustering. Debates often descend into acrimony and mudslinging, detracting from substantive policy discussions and constructive deliberation. This legislative dysfunction hampers the Parliament's ability to effectively address pressing issues and fulfill its constitutional responsibilities.
Another challenge is the limited participation of marginalized and underrepresented groups, including women, minorities, and disadvantaged communities, in the political process. Despite constitutional provisions for reservation of seats and affirmative action, women and marginalized groups continue to face barriers to political participation and representation, perpetuating inequalities and exclusion in parliamentary democracy.
In conclusion, while parliamentary democracy has been a foundational principle of governance in India, its functioning is characterized by a mix of strengths and challenges. While it provides for political stability, representation, and accountability, it also grapples with issues such as political fragmentation, electoral corruption, legislative gridlock, and social exclusion. Addressing these challenges requires concerted efforts to strengthen democratic institutions, promote ethical and inclusive politics, and enhance the responsiveness and effectiveness of parliamentary democracy in India.