Define Doxastic Coherentism.
Himanshu KulshreshthaElite Author
Asked: March 4, 20242024-03-04T12:35:07+05:30 2024-03-04T12:35:07+05:30In: Philosophy
Define Doxastic Coherentism.
Share
Related Questions
- Write a short note on explain the functions of Central Secretariat.
- Write a short note on describe the characteristics of Pressure groups in India.
- Write a short note on enumerate the financial resources of urban local bodies.
- Write a short note on the National Commission for Scheduled Castes.
- Write a short note on describe the reform measures undertaken by government since Independence.
- Write a short note on briefly explain the scope and forms of Judicial control over administration.
- Write a short note on explain the provisions underlying the financial relations between the Union and the state.
- Write a short note on discuss the issues confronting Police Administrations.
Doxastic coherentism is an epistemological theory that focuses on the coherence of beliefs within an individual's belief system as the primary criterion for assessing their justification and truth. In contrast to foundationalism, which seeks to ground beliefs on certain, foundational beliefs, doxastic coherentism emphasizes the interrelations and mutual support among various beliefs.
According to doxastic coherentism, the justification of a belief is derived from its coherence with other beliefs in a person's overall belief network rather than from any foundational, indubitable beliefs. The idea is that beliefs are mutually reinforcing, and the coherence among them contributes to their epistemic justification.
Doxastic coherentism acknowledges that beliefs derive their justification from their systematic and coherent relationships with other beliefs, rather than relying on an external foundation. This approach allows for a more dynamic understanding of justification, where beliefs can be revisited and adjusted in light of new information or changes in the overall belief system.
Critics of doxastic coherentism often raise challenges related to circularity and the potential for a lack of objective standards. Nevertheless, proponents argue that the theory better captures the holistic and interconnected nature of human beliefs and knowledge.