Define Kalam Argument for the Existence of God.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument is a philosophical and theological argument for the existence of God that centers on the concept of time and the origin of the universe. The argument can be summarized in three key propositions:
Everything That Begins to Exist Has a Cause: The Kalam Argument posits that everything in the universe that comes into existence has a cause. It draws upon the principle of causality, asserting that entities or events do not begin to exist without a preceding cause.
The Universe Began to Exist: Building on scientific and cosmological discoveries suggesting a finite age of the universe, the argument contends that the cosmos had a beginning. If the universe began to exist, the Kalam Argument implies that it must have had a cause or explanation for its origin.
Therefore, the Universe Has a Cause: By combining the first two propositions, the conclusion follows that the universe has a cause for its existence. The cause must be transcendent, immaterial, and timeless since it precedes the creation of time and space.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument is often associated with thinkers like medieval Islamic philosopher Al-Ghazali and later popularized by contemporary scholars such as William Lane Craig. While it has faced criticisms and alternative interpretations, the argument remains influential in discussions about the nature and origin of the cosmos.