Discuss at least four Case Laws on Registration of Cooperative Society.

Several case laws in India have contributed to shaping the legal framework governing the registration of cooperative societies. These cases have addressed various aspects of the registration process, including eligibility criteria, procedural requirements, and the role of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Here are four notable case laws on the registration of cooperative societies:

1. Mathura Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, 1966:
   In this case, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of the power of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to refuse registration to a cooperative society. The court held that while the Registrar has discretion to refuse registration if the society does not meet the eligibility criteria or fails to comply with the procedural requirements, such discretion must be exercised judiciously and in accordance with the principles of natural justice. The case emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and transparency in the registration process to prevent arbitrary or discriminatory actions by the Registrar.

2. State of Kerala v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1971:
   This case dealt with the validity of the registration of cooperative societies operating across state boundaries. The Supreme Court held that cooperative societies registered in one state can operate in another state under the principle of inter-state cooperation, provided they comply with the registration and regulatory requirements of both states. The case underscored the importance of harmonizing cooperative laws and regulations across states to facilitate the seamless operation of cooperative societies across state boundaries.

3. Saharanpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh, 1972:
   In this case, the Allahabad High Court considered the jurisdiction of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to refuse registration to a cooperative society. The court held that the Registrar's jurisdiction to refuse registration is limited to cases where the society does not fulfill the eligibility criteria or fails to comply with the procedural requirements specified in the cooperative laws. The Registrar cannot refuse registration arbitrarily or without sufficient cause, and any refusal must be based on valid grounds supported by evidence.

4. Raghuraj Singh v. Registrar, Coop. Societies, 1992:
   This case addressed the validity of the registration of a cooperative society despite objections raised by certain individuals. The Delhi High Court held that objections to the registration of a cooperative society must be considered by the Registrar in accordance with the cooperative laws and procedural rules. The Registrar cannot arbitrarily reject objections without due consideration or without providing reasons for the decision. The case emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the registration process to ensure that objections are fairly addressed and decided upon.

These case laws highlight the significance of adherence to legal requirements, procedural fairness, and transparency in the registration of cooperative societies. They provide valuable guidance to cooperative societies, members, and regulatory authorities in navigating the registration process and upholding the integrity of cooperative governance.