Discuss the definition and essential Ingredients of the following under the Indian Penal Code 1860.
a) Criminal Conspiracy (Sec 120A) b) Dishonest Misappropriation of Properly (Sec-403)
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, criminal conspiracy and dishonest misappropriation of property are two distinct offenses with specific definitions and essential ingredients. Let's discuss each of them in detail:
a) Criminal Conspiracy (Section 120A IPC):
Definition: Criminal conspiracy is defined under Section 120A of the IPC as an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or an act which is not illegal by illegal means. The essence of criminal conspiracy lies in the agreement itself, regardless of whether the illegal act is actually carried out.
Essential Ingredients:
Agreement: The first essential ingredient of criminal conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or an act by illegal means. The agreement need not be formal or in writing but must be a meeting of minds with a common intention to achieve the unlawful objective.
Illegal Object or Means: The agreement must be for the purpose of achieving an illegal object or using illegal means. The object of the conspiracy may be to commit any offense punishable under the IPC or any other law in force.
Two or More Persons: The agreement must involve at least two or more persons. A single person acting alone cannot be charged with criminal conspiracy as there must be a plurality of conspirators.
Intention to Commit the Offense: There must be a common intention or mutual understanding among the conspirators to commit the illegal act or achieve the illegal object. Mere knowledge of the illegal act by one person without actively participating in the conspiracy may not constitute criminal conspiracy.
Overt Act: Unlike some other jurisdictions, Indian law does not require the commission of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy for it to be punishable. The mere agreement to commit an illegal act or use illegal means is sufficient to establish the offense of criminal conspiracy.
b) Dishonest Misappropriation of Property (Section 403 IPC):
Definition: Dishonest misappropriation of property is defined under Section 403 of the IPC as the dishonest conversion of movable property to one's own use without the consent of the owner, followed by wrongful gain or loss to the owner.
Essential Ingredients:
Dishonest Misappropriation: The accused must dishonestly misappropriate or convert movable property to their own use. Dishonest misappropriation implies a deliberate intention to deprive the owner of their property without their consent.
Movable Property: The property subject to misappropriation must be movable property, such as money, goods, documents, or valuable securities. Immovable property is not covered under this offense.
Without Consent of Owner: The misappropriation must occur without the consent of the owner of the property. If the owner consents to the use of their property, it cannot be considered misappropriation.
Wrongful Gain or Loss: The misappropriation must result in wrongful gain to the accused or wrongful loss to the owner of the property. The accused benefits from the misappropriation, either by gaining something valuable or by causing financial loss to the owner.
In summary, criminal conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or use illegal means, while dishonest misappropriation of property entails the wrongful conversion of movable property to one's own use without the consent of the owner, resulting in wrongful gain or loss. These offenses are distinct but share the common element of dishonesty and wrongful intent.