Talk in-depth about the numerous assessment factors that are important when choosing an ILS.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Evaluation Criteria for Selecting an Integrated Library System (ILS)
Selecting an Integrated Library System (ILS) is a critical decision for libraries, as it affects the efficiency and effectiveness of library operations. Several key evaluation criteria should be considered when selecting an ILS:
Functionality: The ILS should meet the functional requirements of the library, including cataloging, circulation, acquisitions, serials control, and reporting. It should also support emerging trends such as electronic resource management and digital collections.
Scalability: The ILS should be scalable to accommodate the library's current and future needs, including the ability to handle increasing numbers of users, items, and transactions.
Interoperability: The ILS should be able to integrate with other library systems and services, such as discovery layers, electronic resource management systems, and digital repositories. Interoperability ensures seamless access to information for users and efficient library operations.
Usability: The ILS should have an intuitive and user-friendly interface for both library staff and users. It should be easy to navigate, with clear instructions and help features.
Customization: The ILS should allow for customization to meet the specific needs of the library. This includes the ability to customize workflows, data fields, and reports.
Support and Training: The ILS vendor should provide adequate support and training to library staff to ensure effective implementation and use of the system. This includes technical support, training materials, and ongoing updates and maintenance.
Cost: The cost of the ILS, including initial implementation costs, ongoing maintenance costs, and any additional fees for upgrades or support, should be considered in relation to the library's budget and resources.
Vendor Reputation: The reputation and track record of the ILS vendor should be considered, including the vendor's experience, customer satisfaction, and financial stability.
Accessibility: The ILS should be accessible to users with disabilities, complying with relevant accessibility standards and guidelines.
Security: The ILS should have robust security features to protect library data and user information, including encryption, authentication, and access control.
By carefully evaluating these criteria, libraries can select an ILS that meets their needs and supports their mission to provide access to information and resources for their users.