Explain Satyagraha Vs Duragraha.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Satyagraha vs. Duragraha:
Satyagraha:
Satyagraha is a concept developed by Mahatma Gandhi, meaning "truth-force" or "soul-force." It is a nonviolent resistance or civil disobedience strategy rooted in the pursuit of truth and moral principles. Satyagrahis engage in peaceful protests, boycotts, and non-cooperation to confront injustice, oppression, or unethical practices. The emphasis is on appealing to the conscience of the oppressor and seeking to transform both the individual and the society through nonviolent means. Satyagraha aims at resolving conflicts and achieving justice without hatred or harm.
Duragraha:
Duragraha, on the other hand, represents the opposite approach, where force or violence is employed to resist or confront injustice. "Dura" means force, and Duragraha involves using physical or coercive means to assert one's demands or oppose perceived wrongs. Unlike Satyagraha, Duragraha relies on aggression and may involve actions that cause harm or damage. Gandhi strongly advocated against Duragraha, emphasizing the destructive nature of violence and the belief that it ultimately perpetuates cycles of hatred and revenge.
In summary, Satyagraha advocates nonviolent resistance and appeals to moral principles, seeking transformation through love and understanding, while Duragraha involves the use of force or violence to resist oppression, often leading to destructive consequences. Gandhi's philosophy overwhelmingly favored the former, emphasizing the power of truth and nonviolence in achieving social and political change.