Explain the nature of the Maratha state.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Maratha state, emerging in the 17th century in western India, was characterized by a decentralized and confederate structure. The Marathas, under the leadership of Shivaji and later Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, built a formidable military power known for its guerrilla tactics and administrative innovations.
The nature of the Maratha state was marked by a confederation of semi-autonomous regions, each governed by Maratha chieftains called sardars or sardar-i-sardars. These regions enjoyed considerable autonomy in local governance, revenue collection, and military administration.
The Marathas followed a revenue system known as the 'chauth' and 'sardeshmukhi,' wherein they collected one-fourth of the land revenue as tribute and an additional ten percent from certain territories. This decentralized revenue collection system allowed for flexibility and adaptability to local conditions.
Despite this decentralized structure, the Maratha state faced challenges in maintaining cohesion due to internal rivalries among the chieftains and external pressures from Mughal and later British powers. The lack of a centralized authority weakened the Maratha confederation, eventually leading to its decline in the 18th century.
In summary, the Maratha state exhibited a unique combination of centralized military leadership under the Chhatrapati, coupled with a decentralized administrative structure where local chieftains enjoyed significant autonomy. This duality contributed to both the military prowess and internal challenges faced by the Marathas during their historical prominence.