Locke makes a distinction between demonstrative and intuitive knowledge.
How does Locke distinguish between intuitive and demonstrative knowledge?
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
John Locke, a prominent 17th-century philosopher, distinguished between intuitive and demonstrative knowledge in his work "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding."
Intuitive Knowledge: Intuitive knowledge, for Locke, is the most immediate and certain form of knowledge. It occurs when the connection between ideas is immediately perceived without the need for additional reasoning. It is a direct and self-evident grasp of the agreement or disagreement between ideas. For example, the idea of white being different from black or the idea that a whole is greater than any of its parts can be intuitively known.
Demonstrative Knowledge: Demonstrative knowledge involves a more complex process of reasoning. It is characterized by a series of linked, intermediate ideas that connect to demonstrate the truth or falsehood of a proposition. Demonstrative knowledge relies on clear and distinct ideas, and the connection between the ideas is not immediately evident but established through a step-by-step demonstration. Mathematics, with its rigorous proofs, often serves as an example of demonstrative knowledge.
In summary, while intuitive knowledge is immediate and self-evident, requiring no intermediate steps, demonstrative knowledge involves a more complex chain of reasoning and requires clear, distinct ideas to establish the connection between concepts. Locke's distinction contributes to his broader empiricist epistemology, emphasizing the role of sensory experience and reasoning in the acquisition of knowledge.