How does Redcliffe-Brown view the institution of totemism?
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Alfred Radcliffe-Brown, a prominent British social anthropologist, offered his insights on the institution of totemism, particularly in his work "Structure and Function in Primitive Society" (1952). Redcliffe-Brown approached totemism from a structural functionalist perspective, emphasizing its role in maintaining social order and cohesion within a society.
Social Structure and Solidarity:
Radcliffe-Brown viewed totemism as a social phenomenon that played a crucial role in establishing and reinforcing social structure and solidarity. Totemism, according to him, provided a framework for organizing social relationships and determining the rights and obligations of individuals within the community.
Segmentary Lineage System:
He proposed the concept of a segmentary lineage system associated with totemism. In such a system, society is organized into segments or groups, and each segment identifies with a specific totem. These totemic identities are not arbitrary but are deeply embedded in social organization and relationships. Radcliffe-Brown argued that the totemic system reflects and reinforces the segmentary structure of society.
Social Functions:
Totemism, for Radcliffe-Brown, served various social functions, including the regulation of marriage and social interactions. The totemic system helped define permissible and impermissible relationships, contributing to social order and preventing incestuous unions. Additionally, he highlighted the role of totems in reinforcing a sense of group identity and loyalty, fostering solidarity among the members of a particular totemic group.
Symbolic Representation:
Totems, according to Radcliffe-Brown, functioned as symbols representing the social structure and relationships within a society. They were not merely objects of religious reverence but were emblematic of the larger social order. The symbolism associated with totems contributed to the reinforcement of social norms and values.
In summary, Radcliffe-Brown's perspective on totemism emphasizes its integral role in structuring and maintaining social order. Totemism, according to him, is not a random assortment of symbolic beliefs but a reflection of the underlying social organization and the intricate web of relationships within a society. Radcliffe-Brown's structural functionalist approach laid the groundwork for understanding totemism as a dynamic and integral aspect of social life.