How can selecting a subpar medium affect communication? Give an example using a situation from your own life.
How is communication disrupted when we choose an inferior medium? Exemplify with an instance from your own life.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Choosing an inferior medium of communication can disrupt the effectiveness of the message being conveyed in various ways. One key disruption is the potential for misinterpretation or misunderstanding due to limitations of the chosen medium. Here's an example from my own life:
A few years ago, I was part of a team working on a project with members located in different cities across the country. We primarily communicated through email and occasional video conferences. While email is a convenient medium for sharing information, it became evident that it had its limitations when it came to conveying complex ideas and emotions.
During one phase of the project, there was a significant disagreement among team members regarding the direction we should take. Some team members were advocating for a particular approach, while others had reservations. The debate escalated through email exchanges, with each side defending their position through written messages.
The problem here was that email lacked the nuances of face-to-face or even voice communication. The written medium made it challenging to gauge the tone and emotions behind the messages. As a result, what started as a professional discussion began to take on a confrontational tone, and individuals felt their viewpoints were not being heard or respected.
In hindsight, it became evident that choosing email as the primary medium for such a critical discussion was an inferior choice. It disrupted effective communication because it failed to convey the emotional nuances, body language, and real-time feedback that could have facilitated a more productive dialogue. Eventually, the project suffered delays, and it took additional effort to rebuild trust and resolve the disagreement through a more suitable medium, which in this case turned out to be a video conference.
This experience taught me the importance of selecting the right medium for different communication scenarios. While email is excellent for sharing information and routine updates, it may not be the best choice for complex discussions or addressing emotionally charged topics. In such cases, opting for more direct and interactive forms of communication can prevent misunderstandings and facilitate more effective dialogue.