Name some of the scholars who worked on ‘neo-structuralism’.

Neo-structuralism, also known as structuralism in its renewed form, emerged as a reaction to and evolution of the earlier structuralist theories in anthropology. While the original structuralism focused on uncovering deep structures underlying cultural phenomena, neo-structuralism sought to address criticisms and adapt to new theoretical frameworks. Some scholars who have contributed to neo-structuralist thought include:

1. Claude Lévi-Strauss: Often considered the founder of structuralism in anthropology, Lévi-Strauss laid the groundwork for both structuralism and its later iterations. His work, such as "Structural Anthropology" (1958), emphasized the importance of uncovering underlying structures of human thought and culture.

2. Marshall Sahlins: Sahlins is known for his contributions to neo-structuralist thought through his critiques of earlier structuralist approaches. His work, including "Culture and Practical Reason" (1976) and "Islands of History" (1985), focused on the relationship between structure and agency, challenging simplistic structuralist views of culture.

3. Pierre Bourdieu: Bourdieu's theory of practice, outlined in works such as "Outline of a Theory of Practice" (1972), can be considered a form of neo-structuralism. He emphasized the role of social structures, habitus, and symbolic capital in shaping individual behavior and social relations.

4. David Schneider: Schneider's work in kinship studies, particularly his critique of the universalist approach to kinship, contributed to the development of neo-structuralist perspectives. His book "American Kinship: A Cultural Account" (1968) challenged the notion of kinship as a universal social institution and emphasized its cultural variability.

5. Maurice Godelier: Godelier's work in Marxist anthropology and his critiques of earlier structuralist theories contributed to the development of neo-structuralism. His book "The Mental and the Material: Thought Economy and Society" (1986) addressed the relationship between ideology, social structure, and material conditions.

6. Edmund Leach: Leach's contributions to kinship studies and his critiques of structuralist approaches in anthropology positioned him within the neo-structuralist camp. His work, including "Political Systems of Highland Burma" (1954) and "Culture and Communication: The Logic by Which Symbols Are Connected" (1976), emphasized the importance of context and historical specificity in understanding social structures.

These scholars, among others, have played crucial roles in shaping neo-structuralist thought within anthropology. Their work represents a continuation and refinement of structuralist ideas, incorporating new theoretical frameworks and addressing criticisms to provide a more nuanced understanding of human culture and society.