What do you mean by Judicial Activism?

Judicial activism refers to the proactive role of the judiciary in interpreting and applying the law, often extending beyond traditional legal constraints to address social, political, and economic issues. It involves judges actively shaping public policy, protecting individual rights, and addressing societal concerns, even in the absence of explicit legislative mandates.

In a judicially active system, courts may take a more interventionist approach, interpreting the Constitution broadly and creatively to safeguard fundamental rights and promote justice. Judicial activism is often associated with courts making decisions that impact public policy, challenge legislative actions, or compel the government to act in specific ways to protect citizens' rights.

While judicial activism is seen as a means to address gaps or injustices in the legal system, critics argue that it can encroach on the domain of the legislative and executive branches, potentially undermining the principles of separation of powers. The concept underscores the dynamic and evolving role of the judiciary in shaping and influencing the broader socio-legal landscape.