Write a brief essay on administrative changes as recommended by India’s Administrative changes Commissions.
Write a note on administrative reforms, as propounded by the Administrative Reforms Commissions in India.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
1. Introduction to Administrative Reforms**
Definition and Purpose
Administrative reforms refer to the deliberate changes made to the structures, processes, and functions of government organizations to improve their efficiency, effectiveness, and responsiveness. In India, administrative reforms have been a continuous process aimed at making governance more transparent, accountable, and citizen-centric.
Significance
Administrative reforms are crucial for adapting to changing socio-economic environments, addressing emerging challenges, and meeting the expectations of citizens. They aim to streamline administrative processes, reduce red tape, enhance service delivery, and foster good governance.
2. First Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC)**
Establishment and Objectives
The First Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) was established in 1966 to examine the public administration system in India and suggest measures for its improvement. The commission, chaired by Morarji Desai and later K. Hanumanthaiah, submitted 20 reports containing 537 major recommendations.
Key Recommendations
Administrative Efficiency
The First ARC recommended measures to improve administrative efficiency, including the reorganization of ministries and departments, delegation of powers, and simplification of procedures. It emphasized the need for clear and accountable administrative structures.
Personnel Administration
Reforms in personnel administration were a major focus. The ARC suggested improvements in recruitment, training, and career development of civil servants. It recommended the establishment of a professional cadre of administrators with a focus on merit and performance.
Financial Administration
The commission proposed reforms in financial administration to enhance fiscal discipline and accountability. Recommendations included better budgeting processes, stricter audit controls, and decentralization of financial powers to lower levels of administration.
Administrative Accountability
To ensure accountability, the ARC advocated for the establishment of institutions like the Lokpal and Lokayuktas to address corruption and maladministration. It also recommended strengthening the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and implementing rigorous performance evaluation systems.
3. Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2nd ARC)**
Establishment and Objectives
The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2nd ARC) was constituted in 2005 under the chairmanship of Veerappa Moily. The objective was to prepare a detailed blueprint for revamping the public administration system to make it more effective, efficient, and citizen-friendly.
Key Recommendations
Citizen-Centric Administration
The 2nd ARC emphasized the need for a citizen-centric administration. It recommended measures to improve public service delivery, including the adoption of e-governance, setting up of citizen charters, and establishing public grievance redressal mechanisms.
Decentralization and Panchayati Raj
Decentralization was a significant focus area. The 2nd ARC suggested strengthening local governance institutions like Panchayati Raj and urban local bodies. It recommended greater devolution of powers, functions, and finances to these bodies to make them more effective.
Ethics and Accountability
To enhance ethics and accountability, the 2nd ARC recommended the formulation of a Code of Ethics for civil servants and the establishment of ethics committees. It also advocated for strengthening anti-corruption institutions and measures to protect whistleblowers.
Governance and Public Administration Reforms
The commission suggested comprehensive reforms in governance and public administration, including the restructuring of ministries and departments, improving inter-departmental coordination, and fostering a performance-oriented culture. It also highlighted the importance of capacity building and training for civil servants.
Disaster Management
Recognizing the importance of effective disaster management, the 2nd ARC recommended the establishment of a National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) and State Disaster Management Authorities (SDMAs). It stressed the need for a proactive approach to disaster preparedness and response.
4. Implementation and Impact of ARC Recommendations**
Implementation Challenges
While the recommendations of the ARC and 2nd ARC were comprehensive, their implementation has faced several challenges. These include bureaucratic resistance, lack of political will, and resource constraints. The effectiveness of reforms has varied across different states and sectors.
Success Stories
Despite challenges, there have been notable successes in the implementation of ARC recommendations. The adoption of e-governance initiatives, establishment of Lokayuktas in several states, and the strengthening of local governance institutions are some positive outcomes. Reforms in financial administration and public service delivery have also shown significant improvements.
Ongoing Reforms
The process of administrative reforms is ongoing. The government continues to implement various ARC recommendations, focusing on enhancing transparency, accountability, and efficiency. Recent initiatives include the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), reforms in public procurement, and the Digital India campaign.
Conclusion
Administrative reforms, as propounded by the Administrative Reforms Commissions in India, have played a crucial role in transforming public administration. The recommendations of both the First ARC and the 2nd ARC have provided a comprehensive blueprint for enhancing administrative efficiency, accountability, and responsiveness. While implementation challenges remain, the ongoing efforts to adopt and adapt these recommendations are crucial for achieving good governance and meeting the evolving needs of citizens. The continuous pursuit of administrative reforms underscores the commitment to building a more effective and citizen-centric administration in India.