Write a short note on bring out the important features of Montague Chelmsford Reforms.
Write a short note on bring out the important features of Montague Chelmsford Reforms.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Montague-Chelmsford Reforms, also known as the Government of India Act 1919, marked a significant milestone in India's journey towards self-governance and constitutional development during the British colonial era. These reforms were initiated by the British government in response to growing demands for political participation and representation from Indian nationalists. Here are the important features of the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms:
1. Introduction of Dyarchy:
The most notable feature of the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms was the introduction of the dyarchical system of government in British India. This system divided the powers of government between the central and provincial levels. At the central level, the subjects were categorized into reserved and transferred domains. Reserved subjects were under the control of British officials, while transferred subjects were under Indian ministers. However, the ultimate authority remained with the British Viceroy and his executive council.
2. Expansion of Legislative Councils:
The reforms expanded the size and scope of legislative councils at both the central and provincial levels. They provided for the inclusion of Indian members in the legislative councils, albeit with limited powers. The majority of members in the provincial legislative councils were elected, albeit indirectly, through a system of communal representation and limited franchise. However, the central legislative council continued to be dominated by British officials.
3. Introduction of Diarchy at the Provincial Level:
Similar to the central government, the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms introduced a system of dyarchy at the provincial level as well. The provincial subjects were also divided into reserved and transferred categories, with elected Indian ministers responsible for transferred subjects. This arrangement aimed to gradually increase Indian participation in the administration and prepare them for self-governance.
4. Separate Electorates:
The reforms retained the system of separate electorates for Muslims and other minorities, which had been introduced earlier by the Morley-Minto Reforms. This system provided for separate representation of different religious communities in legislative bodies, further institutionalizing communal divisions in Indian politics.
5. Extension of Franchise:
The Montague-Chelmsford Reforms expanded the franchise slightly, albeit in a limited manner. The reforms introduced a property qualification for voting, which restricted the electorate predominantly to the affluent sections of society. Additionally, the separate electorates system further fragmented the electorate along communal lines, limiting the scope of genuine political representation.
In conclusion, while the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms represented a significant step towards constitutional development and increased Indian participation in governance, they fell short of meeting the aspirations of Indian nationalists for full-fledged self-government and representative democracy. Nevertheless, these reforms laid the groundwork for further constitutional reforms and ultimately paved the way for India's independence in 1947.