Write a short note on explain the limitations of judicial control over administration.

Judicial control over administration refers to the role of courts in reviewing administrative actions to ensure they adhere to the principles of legality, fairness, and rationality. While judicial review serves as a crucial mechanism for upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights, it also has certain limitations:

1. Limited Expertise: Courts may lack the technical expertise and specialized knowledge required to evaluate complex administrative decisions effectively. This can pose challenges in cases involving technical or scientific matters, where judges may defer to administrative expertise.

2. Judicial Restraint: Courts often exercise judicial restraint in matters involving policy or discretionary decisions, deferring to administrative discretion unless it is shown to be arbitrary, irrational, or unlawful. This limits the scope of judicial review and may result in deference to administrative agencies.

3. Delay and Expense: Judicial review proceedings can be time-consuming, costly, and burdensome for litigants, especially in cases involving administrative appeals or judicial challenges. Delay and expense may deter individuals or organizations from seeking redress through the courts.

4. Presumption of Regularity: Courts typically presume the regularity and validity of administrative actions, placing the burden of proof on the party challenging the decision. This presumption may make it challenging for individuals to challenge administrative actions, especially in the absence of clear evidence of illegality or unfairness.

5. Separation of Powers: Judicial control over administration must respect the principle of separation of powers and the autonomy of administrative agencies. Courts may hesitate to intervene in administrative matters perceived as falling within the realm of executive discretion or policy-making.

6. Limited Remedies: Courts may have limited powers to remedy administrative wrongs or provide effective relief to aggrieved parties. Remedies such as monetary compensation or injunctions may not always be sufficient to address the broader systemic issues underlying administrative actions.

Despite these limitations, judicial control over administration plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability, transparency, and legality in government actions. It serves as a check on administrative abuse of power and promotes the rule of law by holding public authorities accountable to legal standards and constitutional principles.