Write a short note on Revenue Farming (Ijara).
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Revenue farming, also known as Ijara, was a system of revenue collection that prevailed in various parts of India, particularly during the medieval and early modern periods. This system was characterized by the leasing out of revenue rights or tax collection responsibilities to private individuals or entities, often through a competitive bidding process.
Origin and Development:
The practice of revenue farming can be traced back to the pre-Mughal and Mughal periods. The Mughal emperors, in their efforts to streamline revenue collection, introduced the Ijara system as a way to ensure a regular flow of revenue into the imperial treasury. The system gained further prominence during the later Mughal era and continued under various regional powers.
Functioning of Revenue Farming:
Under the Ijara system, the government would lease out the right to collect revenue from a particular area or administrative unit to the highest bidder. The highest bidder, known as the Ijardar or farmer, would pay a fixed sum or a percentage of the revenue upfront to the government. In return, the Ijardar would have the right to collect revenue from the designated area for a specified period.
Competitive Bidding:
The process of revenue farming involved competitive bidding, where interested individuals or groups would bid for the right to collect revenue from a specific region. The bidding process aimed to maximize government revenue while providing an incentive for the Ijardar to efficiently collect taxes. However, the competitive nature of bidding sometimes led to excessive taxation and exploitation of the local population.
Challenges and Abuses:
While revenue farming served as a source of revenue for the government, it was not without challenges. The Ijardars, driven by profit motives, often resorted to aggressive and exploitative methods to maximize their returns. This could result in oppressive taxation, harassment of peasants, and economic hardships for the local population.
Decline of Revenue Farming:
The Ijara system faced criticism and opposition due to its inherent flaws and exploitative tendencies. As the British East India Company consolidated its control over India, it gradually phased out the Ijara system. The Permanent Settlement in Bengal (1793) and the Ryotwari Settlement in Madras (1802) marked a shift towards direct revenue collection from individual cultivators, reducing the reliance on revenue farming.
Legacy and Impact:
Despite its drawbacks, the Ijara system left a lasting impact on the agrarian history of India. It influenced subsequent revenue systems and administrative structures. The legacy of revenue farming highlights the complexities of revenue collection in pre-modern India, where various systems were experimented with to strike a balance between government revenue needs and the welfare of the agrarian population.
In conclusion, revenue farming, or Ijara, was a historical revenue collection system in India characterized by the leasing of revenue rights to private individuals through competitive bidding. While it served as a source of revenue for the government, the system faced challenges and criticisms due to its exploitative tendencies. The decline of revenue farming marked a shift in revenue collection methods, but its legacy continued to shape the trajectory of agrarian systems in India.