Write a short note on Subordination of the native capital under the British.
Write a short note on Subordination of the native capital under the British.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The subordination of native capital under British colonial rule in India was a complex process that significantly impacted the economic landscape of the subcontinent. British policies and practices were deliberately designed to favor British economic interests, leading to the subjugation of indigenous capital and hindering the development of a self-sufficient Indian economy.
One crucial aspect of this subordination was the imposition of discriminatory trade policies. The British East India Company, which initially held a monopoly over trade with India, implemented policies that favored the export of raw materials from India to Britain and the import of finished goods back to India. This trade imbalance worked against the interests of indigenous industries, preventing them from flourishing and competing on a level playing field.
The introduction of high tariffs and duties further disadvantaged native businesses. British authorities imposed heavy taxes on Indian goods, making them less competitive in both domestic and international markets. This not only hindered the growth of Indian industries but also contributed to the deindustrialization of certain regions as traditional artisans and manufacturers struggled to sustain their livelihoods.
The British also controlled key sectors of the Indian economy, such as banking and finance. The establishment of British-controlled banks and financial institutions allowed the colonial rulers to dictate credit flows and capital allocation. This control over financial resources limited the ability of native entrepreneurs to access funds for investment and expansion, reinforcing the economic subordination.
Land revenue policies were another tool used to subordinate native capital. The British implemented land taxation systems that often led to the dispossession of traditional landowners and cultivators. The revenue demands imposed on farmers, coupled with exploitative tenancy arrangements, squeezed the agricultural sector, which was a significant contributor to native capital.
Furthermore, the British discouraged the development of indigenous industries that could potentially compete with British products. This was done by imposing technological restrictions, limiting the entry of Indians into certain professions, and controlling access to modern education that could foster entrepreneurial skills.
The consequences of the subordination of native capital were profound. It not only stifled economic growth and innovation but also had long-lasting social and political implications. The economic dependence created during the colonial period laid the groundwork for broader inequalities and disparities that persisted even after India gained independence in 1947.
In conclusion, the subordination of native capital under British colonial rule in India was a deliberate and systematic process. Through discriminatory economic policies and control over key sectors, the British consolidated economic power in their hands, perpetuating a legacy of economic inequality that India had to grapple with during and after the colonial era.