Write a very short note on Judith Ticker’s critique of Realism.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Judith Tickner, a prominent feminist scholar in the field of International Relations (IR), offered a significant critique of Realism, a dominant theoretical perspective in IR. Tickner's critique focuses on the gendered assumptions and oversights within Realist thought:
Tickner argued that Realism, with its emphasis on power politics, state-centric approach, and a focus on military capabilities, tends to perpetuate traditional gender roles and stereotypes. Realist theories often neglect the role of women in international affairs, reinforcing a masculine-centric understanding of power and security.
Tickner also highlighted the absence of gender considerations in Realist analyses of conflict and war. Realist scholars, according to Tickner, often overlook the differential impact of conflicts on women and fail to recognize the agency of women in shaping and responding to international events.
Furthermore, Tickner critiqued Realism's tendency to prioritize the security of the state over human security, overlooking the broader implications of security for diverse populations, including women and marginalized groups.
In essence, Judith Tickner's critique challenges Realism for its gender-blindness and its failure to account for the diverse experiences and contributions of women in the realm of international relations. Her work has been influential in pushing for a more inclusive and gender-sensitive approach within the discipline.