Name any three of the main criminology schools of thought.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
1. Classical School of Criminology
Historical Context and Founders:
The Classical School of Criminology emerged in the 18th century, primarily influenced by the Enlightenment thinkers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham. This school of thought arose as a response to the arbitrary and brutal criminal justice systems of the time, advocating for a more rational and humane approach to punishment and law enforcement.
Key Principles:
The Classical School is based on the idea that individuals have free will and make rational choices. It posits that people commit crimes after weighing the potential benefits against the possible consequences. Therefore, the primary way to deter crime is through the certainty, swiftness, and proportionality of punishment.
Deterrence Theory:
A cornerstone of the Classical School is the deterrence theory, which argues that clear and predictable punishments will discourage individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. According to this theory, effective deterrence requires that punishments be severe enough to outweigh the perceived benefits of the crime but also proportionate to the offense to ensure justice.
Impact on Modern Criminology:
The Classical School has significantly influenced contemporary criminal justice systems, particularly in the areas of legal reform and the establishment of standardized laws and penalties. Its emphasis on rational choice and deterrence continues to shape policies aimed at preventing crime through systematic and fair punishment.
2. Positivist School of Criminology
Development and Founders:
The Positivist School of Criminology emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, driven by the scientific advancements of the period. Key figures include Cesare Lombroso, who is often regarded as the father of positivist criminology, as well as Enrico Ferri and Raffaele Garofalo.
Scientific Approach:
Unlike the Classical School, the Positivist School applies a scientific approach to understanding criminal behavior. It emphasizes the importance of empirical research and the study of biological, psychological, and social factors that influence criminality. The Positivist School seeks to identify the underlying causes of crime through observation, experimentation, and analysis.
Biological and Psychological Determinism:
Positivists argue that criminal behavior is determined by factors beyond the individual's control. Lombroso, for instance, believed that certain physical characteristics, such as facial asymmetry and cranial anomalies, were indicators of a "born criminal." Later positivists expanded this view to include psychological traits and social conditions that predispose individuals to criminality.
Rehabilitation Focus:
The Positivist School advocates for rehabilitative rather than purely punitive responses to crime. It suggests that understanding the root causes of criminal behavior can lead to effective treatment and prevention strategies. This approach has influenced modern correctional practices, including the development of rehabilitative programs and the use of psychological assessments in criminal justice.
3. Chicago School of Criminology
Origins and Key Figures:
The Chicago School of Criminology emerged in the early 20th century at the University of Chicago. Pioneers such as Robert Park, Ernest Burgess, and Clifford Shaw focused on the social and environmental influences on criminal behavior, particularly in urban settings.
Social Ecology and Urban Environment:
The Chicago School introduced the concept of social ecology, examining how individuals interact with their environment and how these interactions influence behavior. It emphasized the impact of urbanization, industrialization, and social disorganization on crime rates. Researchers from this school studied the spatial distribution of crime, noting that certain neighborhoods, particularly those with high levels of poverty and social instability, had higher crime rates.
Zone Theory:
A significant contribution of the Chicago School is the Zone Theory, or concentric zone model, developed by Park and Burgess. This model describes how cities grow in concentric circles, with distinct social and economic characteristics in each zone. The "zone of transition," typically characterized by high residential mobility and economic deprivation, was identified as having the highest crime rates.
Focus on Socialization:
The Chicago School also highlighted the role of socialization in the development of criminal behavior. Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay's work on juvenile delinquency demonstrated that criminal behavior could be transmitted through cultural and social influences within communities. They argued that addressing social disorganization and improving community cohesion could reduce crime.
Conclusion
The Classical, Positivist, and Chicago Schools of Criminology represent distinct approaches to understanding and addressing criminal behavior. The Classical School focuses on rational choice and deterrence, emphasizing fair and proportionate punishment. The Positivist School applies scientific methods to uncover the biological, psychological, and social determinants of crime, advocating for rehabilitative measures. The Chicago School examines the influence of social and environmental factors on criminal behavior, highlighting the importance of socialization and community dynamics. Together, these schools of thought have shaped modern criminological theories and practices, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of crime and its prevention.