Talk about Hobbes’ opinions on natural rights and the condition of war.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Thomas Hobbes, in his seminal work "Leviathan," presents a stark and pessimistic view of the natural state of humanity. According to Hobbes, the natural condition is a state of war – a "war of every man against every man" – where life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." In this state of nature, individuals are driven by a fundamental right to self-preservation, leading to constant conflict and insecurity.
To escape this chaotic condition, Hobbes argues for the establishment of a social contract and the creation of a powerful sovereign authority, the Leviathan, to maintain order. Through this contract, individuals surrender their natural rights to the sovereign in exchange for security and protection.
Hobbes rejects the concept of natural rights in the traditional sense, contending that in the state of nature, everyone has the right to everything, resulting in perpetual conflict. The establishment of a sovereign authority becomes essential for the preservation of order, substituting natural rights with the artificial creation of civil rights under the authority of the Leviathan. Hobbes's views mark a departure from the classical understanding of natural rights, emphasizing the necessity of a strong central authority to prevent the descent into a chaotic and anarchic state of war.