Talk on the New Public Management’s conceptual framework.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
New Public Management (NPM) is a conceptual framework that emerged in the late 20th century, aiming to transform public administration by borrowing management principles from the private sector. It represents a paradigm shift in public administration, emphasizing efficiency, effectiveness, and responsiveness to the needs of citizens. The conceptual framework of NPM encompasses several key principles:
1. Market Orientation:
NPM introduces market-oriented principles into public administration. It advocates for the application of market mechanisms, such as competition, user choice, and performance measurement, to improve the delivery of public services. This shift towards a market orientation is intended to enhance efficiency and responsiveness in the public sector.
2. Decentralization and Devolution:
A central tenet of NPM is the decentralization of decision-making and service delivery. By devolving authority to lower levels of government or even non-governmental entities, NPM seeks to increase flexibility and responsiveness. This allows for more localized decision-making, better suited to the specific needs of communities or service users.
3. Performance Measurement and Accountability:
NPM places a strong emphasis on performance measurement and accountability. It advocates for the establishment of clear performance indicators and targets, allowing for the assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of public organizations. This emphasis on performance measurement is designed to enhance transparency and accountability in the public sector.
4. Customer-Centric Approach:
NPM introduces a customer-centric approach, viewing citizens as customers and public services as products. This perspective emphasizes meeting the needs and expectations of citizens, promoting user satisfaction, and ensuring that public services are responsive to the demands of the community.
5. Managerialism:
NPM promotes managerialism, emphasizing the importance of professional management practices in the public sector. It calls for the recruitment and training of public managers with skills and expertise drawn from the private sector. This managerial focus is intended to instill a business-like culture within public organizations.
6. Entrepreneurial Spirit:
NPM encourages public organizations to adopt an entrepreneurial spirit, embracing innovation and risk-taking. This involves exploring new ways of delivering services, seeking efficiency gains, and adapting to changing circumstances. The entrepreneurial element is intended to foster a culture of continuous improvement and responsiveness.
7. Contracting Out and Privatization:
NPM supports the contracting out of certain public services to private or non-profit organizations. This principle aims to leverage external expertise, introduce competition, and improve efficiency in service delivery. Privatization, the transfer of public services to private ownership or management, is also considered in line with NPM principles.
8. Results-Based Management:
NPM promotes a results-based management approach, focusing on achieving measurable outcomes rather than merely following bureaucratic procedures. This shift towards outcomes and results aligns with the broader emphasis on performance measurement and accountability in public administration.
In conclusion, the conceptual framework of New Public Management represents a set of principles and practices aimed at introducing market-oriented reforms, enhancing efficiency, and improving the responsiveness of public administration. While NPM has influenced public sector reforms globally, it has also faced criticism for potential drawbacks such as the oversimplification of public sector complexities and the potential neglect of social and equity considerations.