Discuss the limitations of Central Vigilance Commission.

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) in India, while serving as a vital anti-corruption watchdog, faces certain limitations in its scope and functioning. Firstly, the CVC lacks prosecutorial powers, making it reliant on other agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for legal actions, which may impact the timely and effective resolution of corruption cases.

Secondly, the CVC's jurisdiction is limited to central government employees, and it cannot directly investigate corruption cases involving state government officials. This restriction hampers its ability to comprehensively address corruption at all levels of governance.

Additionally, the CVC's recommendations are advisory in nature, lacking binding authority. While it can recommend actions against corrupt officials, the final decision rests with the concerned authorities, potentially leading to delays or non-implementation of suggested measures.

Furthermore, the appointment process of the Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioners is subject to government influence, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and compromising the autonomy of the institution.

Lastly, the CVC may face challenges in ensuring confidentiality, as the sensitive nature of corruption investigations could be prone to leaks, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of ongoing inquiries. These limitations underscore the need for ongoing reforms to strengthen the CVC's mandate and enhance its effectiveness in combating corruption.