Write a note on Fallacies in Indian Logic.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Write a note on Fallacies in Indian Logic.
Indian logic, as presented in the Nyaya and Vaisheshika schools, is known for its rigorous analysis and systematic approach to reasoning. However, like any logical system, it recognizes the possibility of fallacies—flawed patterns of reasoning that may lead to incorrect conclusions. The study of fallacies in Indian logic is essential for refining logical discourse and maintaining the integrity of philosophical debates.
One notable category of fallacies in Indian logic is called "Hetvabhasa," which translates to 'fallacious reason.' Hetvabhasa occurs when an argument appears valid but contains a deceptive or flawed reason. There are various subtypes of Hetvabhasa, each representing a specific kind of fallacious reasoning.
Savyabhicara (Irrelevant Reasoning): This fallacy occurs when the reason provided is irrelevant to the subject under consideration. For example, arguing that "Sound is eternal because it is audible" is flawed as audibility is not a necessary characteristic for eternity.
Viruddha (Contradictory Reasoning): In Viruddha, the reason contradicts the thesis. For instance, asserting that "Fire is cold because it possesses heat" is fallacious because heat and cold are contradictory attributes.
Satpratipaksha (Mutually Destructive Reasoning): This fallacy arises when the reason provided for a thesis would, if true, undermine the very thesis it is meant to support. For instance, arguing that "Knowledge is produced because it is produced" is circular and self-defeating.
Asiddha (Unproved Reasoning): Asiddha occurs when the reason given lacks empirical support or is not established as a valid principle. For example, claiming that "The world is created because it is created" lacks evidential support for the creation assertion.
Understanding and identifying these fallacies in Indian logic is crucial for maintaining the integrity of logical debates, refining philosophical discussions, and ensuring the validity of conclusions drawn through inference. By addressing fallacious reasoning, scholars in Indian logic aim to elevate the quality of discourse and promote a more rigorous and reliable system of logical analysis.