Write a short note on illustrate Kalam’s cosmological argument.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Kalam's cosmological argument is a philosophical and theological argument for the existence of God that dates back to medieval Islamic theology, particularly associated with the Muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali and later refined by Islamic scholars such as Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Al-Ghazali. The argument has gained attention in contemporary philosophy of religion and apologetics for its logical structure and defense of theistic beliefs.
The Kalam cosmological argument can be summarized in the following premises:
The first premise asserts the principle of causality, which holds that every event or entity that comes into existence must have a cause. This principle is based on our common experience and empirical observations of cause-and-effect relationships in the natural world.
The second premise posits that the universe itself began to exist at some point in the finite past. This assertion is supported by modern scientific evidence, particularly the Big Bang theory, which suggests that the universe originated from a singularity approximately 13.8 billion years ago. Thus, if the universe had a beginning, it follows that it must have a cause.
From these premises, the conclusion is drawn that there must exist a transcendent, uncaused cause or "first cause" that brought the universe into existence. This cause is often identified with God, conceived as a necessary and self-existent being outside the bounds of time and space.
Critics of the Kalam cosmological argument may challenge its premises or logical coherence, raising questions about the nature of causality, the applicability of temporal concepts to the origin of the universe, and the inference from a first cause to a personal deity. However, proponents of the argument argue that it provides a rational basis for affirming the existence of a creator or prime mover responsible for the existence of the cosmos.
Overall, the Kalam cosmological argument offers a philosophical framework for contemplating the origins of the universe and the existence of God, inviting further exploration and debate within the realms of metaphysics, theology, and cosmology.